[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by moldoe: Hi, I'm trying to use OOPHM on Windows XP, with IE7. I'm using revision 5631. I have registered oophm.dll. I'm running HostedMode successfully but when I try to access the URL http://localhost:/Client.html?gwt.hosted=128.96.198.63:9997 I get the message: "GWT module '

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread Todd Seiber
I am having the same problem. Until a fix is found you can hack the hosted.html that gets injected in to your module's output directory. var moduleFuncName = window.location.search.substring(1); if (!moduleFuncName || !$wnd[moduleFuncName]) { moduleFuncName = window.name; } moduleFuncName="your

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5632 - Fixed a typo in the template for the ant build files.

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: a...@google.com Date: Thu Jun 25 12:16:13 2009 New Revision: 5632 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/project.ant.xmlsrc Log: Fixed a typo in the template for the ant build files. review by: jat Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/project.ant.xmlsrc =

[gwt-contrib] Comment on EnumOptimizations in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by cromwellian: Joel, wouldn't this transformation work? {{{ foo_Names = ["FOO_0", "FOO_1", "FOO_2"]; fooFuncs = { getMessage: [getMessage1, getMessage1, getMessage2] }; }}} Enum's then become integer ordinals. `FooEnumType.name()` would return `foo_Names[ordinal()]` `FooEnumType.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5634 - Edited wiki page through web user interface.

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: cromwellian Date: Thu Jun 25 16:46:04 2009 New Revision: 5634 Modified: wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface. Modified: wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki ===

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5633 - Added hypothetical "global object interning/inlining" optimization for enums

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: cromwellian Date: Thu Jun 25 16:41:29 2009 New Revision: 5633 Modified: wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki Log: Added hypothetical "global object interning/inlining" optimization for enums Modified: wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki ===

[gwt-contrib] Comment on LightweightCollections in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by sco...@google.com: Dude, this is awesome. Major kudos! For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/LightweightCollections --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Comment on LightweightCollections in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by tamplinjohn: For `MutableArray.freeze`, essentially changing a `MutableArray` to an `ImmutableArray` (even for existing references to the `MutableArray`) seems awkward, and will promote manual copies. I think the builder pattern is probably better here, since it is explicit that

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by dan.kozlowski: I have successfully got the GWT and OOPHM working on Fedora 11 x86_64. here is what i did. Downloaded the latest GWT form subversion ( r5632 ) and built it according to the directions linked above. then i had to extract the created SDK ( build/dist/gwt-linux-0.0.0

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by tamplinjohn: The NPAPI plugin (in the firefox directory) is pretty much dead in the water, since it can't handle changing scrolling on the top window -- try running the Mail sample and see if that works. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/Using

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by tamplinjohn: Also, just putting in an empty sendFreeValues method will cause memory leaks. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Cont

[gwt-contrib] Re: Continuous integration

2009-06-25 Thread Arthur Kalmenson
Good question, I'd be interested in a nightly build of GWT trunk as well. -- Arthur Kalmenson On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:14 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > Hi > is there a pulic CI server for GWT 2.0 where I could get the latest 2.0 > artifacts ? > I'd like to improve the gwt-maven-plugin for gwt-

[gwt-contrib] Comment on WAR_Design_1_6 in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by tohanh82: I want to use GWT in Jdeveloper but I can't find examples for it. Can u help me??? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/WAR_Design_1_6 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolki

[gwt-contrib] Comment on CodeSplitting in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by JasonThrasher: Above: "The -soyc flag is currently only available on the GWTCompiler entry point, not the new Compiler entry point." Is this still true? It seems that the new Compiler takes the -soyc flag, but I don't see any output generated, other than messages saying that the

[gwt-contrib] Comment on CodeSplitting in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by JasonThrasher: Above: "The -soyc flag is currently only available on the GWTCompiler entry point, not the new Compiler entry point." Is this still true? It seems that the new Compiler takes the -soyc flag, but I don't see any output generated, other than messages saying that the

[gwt-contrib] Comment on CodeSplitting in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by JasonThrasher: Above: "The -soyc flag is currently only available on the GWTCompiler entry point, not the new Compiler entry point." Is this still true? It seems that the new Compiler takes the -soyc flag, and the old GWTCompiler does not take the -aux flag. But I don't see any