[gwt-contrib] Re: Any plans for supporting Scala ?

2009-10-11 Thread Lex Spoon
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:23 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: Why would that be easier than just parsing Scala and building an extended GWT AST from the Scala AST?  It seems like inventing a new language (even if it is close to Java) and modifying tools on both sides to use this would

[gwt-contrib] Re: Any plans for supporting Scala ?

2009-10-11 Thread Lex Spoon
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote: if I understand, Lex is not really talking about a new syntax/text representation, but an intermediate Java AST that has none of the restrictions that Java does. I was thinking it would be a text format, but it could

[gwt-contrib] Comment on OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by krisajenkins: I'm getting the same error as jdpatterson, and yes, my project has GWT App Engine enabled. Any ideas? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UiBinderI18n in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by sami.jaber: Ok, after digging more in the source code, its not a problem of i18n. This is just that ui:Hyperlink tag parser has not yet been implemented (in r6342). I have replaced the ui:Hyperlink by a ui:Button, it works fine. The impl contains the span tag and the

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UiBinderI18n in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by t.broyer: @sami.jaber: it should be a gwt:Hyperlink (same namespace as HTMLPanel), not a ui:Hyperlink (same namespace as UiBinder, msg and ph=); there's no specific parser for Hyperlink because the parser for HasHTML is enough. For more information:

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by t.broyer: This error means Firefox tries to load the compiled app, i.e. the devel mode plug-in is not detected. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UiBinderI18n in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by sami.jaber: Yes, that what I thought initially but as the attribute setToken() doesn't exist neither in the Hyperlink user.ui class, I suspected that another class/parser would exists elsewhere. Anyway, that works better now after changing the prefix, the attribute and the

[gwt-contrib] Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by javierplaherr: Work fine in Windows XP, Firefox 3.0.13 and Vaddin libraries (http://vaadin.com/wiki/-/wiki/Main/OOPHM%20Step%20by%20Step) For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UiBinderI18n in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-11 Thread Ray Ryan
BeanParser picks up things like setToken. There are very few custom parsers. On Oct 11, 2009 3:29 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote: Comment by sami.jaber: Yes, that what I thought initially but as the attribute setToken() doesn't exist neither in the Hyperlink user.ui class, I suspected

[gwt-contrib] remote tests should depend on compile.tests

2009-10-11 Thread fabbott
Reviewers: Ray Ryan, Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/78807 Affected files: build.xml Index: build.xml === --- build.xml (revision 6346) +++ build.xml (working copy) @@ -108,11 +108,8 @@

[gwt-contrib] Re: Proposed API Addition - @WithModuleParameters on test cases

2009-10-11 Thread John LaBanca
@jat - When do you think we'll merge the htmlunit branch into trunk so we can check in this patch? Thanks, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Pascal Muetschard pmuetsch...@google.comwrote: I have updated the patch set to also have the benchmark test cases use the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Moving PagingScrollTable Friends to Trunk

2009-10-11 Thread John LaBanca
This has been delayed for a while (maybe Q2 of next year?). We want to refactor the PagingScrollTable and incorporate a ListModel/TreeModel that would apply to multiple widgets and incorporate data binding. It will take some time before anyone has enough time to start working on it. Thanks, John

[gwt-contrib] Re: Table framework

2009-10-11 Thread John LaBanca
Its been delayed while we work on GWT 2.0 and other features. We also want to refactor the table before moving it to trunk, and it might be a while before anyone has enough time to start working on it. Thanks, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:52 AM, dflorey