+1 for OSGi support
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
To be clear, we do recognize the importance of starting to support HTML5
constructs that don't work on all browsers, though we need to find a clear
way to indicate to developers that a particular library or widget won't work
in some cases. None of us have ever worked through all the nuances of how
Revision: 7513
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 02:58:54 2010
Log: Fix a bug where MenuBar loses focus when moving between submenus using
left/right keys. When are maintaining focus when the popup is auto closed
instead of maintaining focus when the popup is manually closed.
Revision: 7514
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 06:10:29 2010
Log: tr...@7513 was merged into this branch
Prevent MenuBar from losing focus when navigating to a new submenu.
svn merge --ignore-ancestry -c 7513
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk .
What about Fred Sauer's gwt voices project?
AFAK it has an elegant approach how to provide flash based fallback if
certain capabilities are not supported by the browser itself.
On 1 Feb., 14:25, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
To be clear, we do recognize the importance of starting to
See:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/4f5fb0cbd007fa25/e6a70c6a26a444cd?lnk=gstq=compatibility+animations#e6a70c6a26a444cd
On 1 Feb., 17:23, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
What about Fred Sauer's gwt voices project?
AFAK it has an
[+fred, just to make sure he sees this]
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:26 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/4f5fb0cbd007fa25/e6a70c6a26a444cd?lnk=gstq=compatibility+animations#e6a70c6a26a444cd
On 1
LGTM, with one nit.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132815/diff/3015/3018
File user/test/com/google/gwt/core/StackTraceLineNumbersTest.gwt.xml
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132815/diff/3015/3018#newcode2
Line 2: !-- Copyright 2008 Google Inc.
--
Copyright date.
Thanks, Bob!
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132815/diff/3015/3018
File user/test/com/google/gwt/core/StackTraceLineNumbersTest.gwt.xml
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132815/diff/3015/3018#newcode2
Line 2: !-- Copyright 2008 Google Inc.
--
On 2010/02/01 16:48:02,
Revision: 7515
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 07:18:28 2010
Log: Moving emma compiled classes above non-emma compiled classes in the
classpath when running tests so we generate proper emma code coverage.
Currently, our code coverage is messed up because we only generate it for
Daniel,
Last time I looked at HTML5 audio support in browsers (in the context of
putting it in to gwt-voices) it was fairly lacking. It's probably a good
time to revisit that though. I'd love to get better native support for audio
since the current state of affairs (i.e. everything before HTML5)
Revision: 7516
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 07:58:03 2010
Log: Fixes issue 4512. In JsStackEmulation, avoid rewriting references to
non-references. For example, don't rewrite bar['foo']() to
(line=123,bar['foo'])(), because that will result in
this being set incorrectly in the
On 1 fév, 20:26, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 7517
Author: tomer...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 08:08:26 2010
Log: Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7517
Added:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and
the subpackage being called translatable rather than super?
Those are JRE and infrastructure super-source -- this is more user-level
code. Also, if you
John,
I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the
list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us...
Since the 2.0 release, I feel that there is less interaction with the
contrib list (btw what have been decided for the roadmap ?) and what we are
supposed to
Reviewers: Lex, scottb,
Message:
Review requested. I'm going to be AFK Tuesday-Thursday, so it's likely
I won't be able to get back to this until next week.
Description:
This is a compiler infrastructure patch that enables annotations to be
selectively recorded within the Java AST. Compiler
Revision: 7518
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 10:46:28 2010
Log: Fix API checker change made in the wrong place.
Patch by: jat
Review by: amitmanjhi
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7518
Modified:
/trunk/tools/api-checker/config/gwt16_20userApi.conf
Comment by djb.bell:
This definitely looks promising. Just a quick question though. Will this
new model allow for a live continuously updating grid/table.
By this I mean as the user scrolls up and down, the model is asked for more
rows and the rows above a paged out. This allows the
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:13 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
By this I mean as the user scrolls up and down, the model is asked for more
rows and the rows above a paged out. This allows the user to scroll around
a large data set with no delay. The amount of rows buffered above and
Comment by rj...@google.com:
Yes, that use case is on our radar.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DataBackedWidgetsDesign
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by andrew.pietsch:
This is looking very nice. I presume the filtering usecase is on the radar
as well?
As another happy user of glazed lists I can also recommend looking at it.
If I remember correctly the author is also a google employee.
Cheers
For more information:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the
list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us...
I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that we were switching to a different
version control
22 matches
Mail list logo
