[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on DataBackedWidgetsDesign in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by andrew.pietsch: There's a few things. Firstly I would have liked the ability intercept and cancel a selection event (like GWTs `TabPanel` does it). i.e. `ListSelectionModel implements HasBeforeSelectionHandlers` or something equivalent. Also Swings `ListSelectionModel` lacks

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT build requirements and packaging for Fedora

2010-02-04 Thread John Tamplin
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:25 AM, jlaska wrote: > I am looking into packaging GWT for Fedora. According to the Fedora > packaging guidelines, all packages must not include any bundled > libraries or JAR files [1]. As a result, I have attempted to identify > the JAR files included in GWT and wheth

[gwt-contrib] Re: BigDecimal, BigInteger, Random support

2010-02-04 Thread jat
Somehow GWTC was dropped from this issue for review. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126811 -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Proposed API Change - Remove HTTPRequest

2010-02-04 Thread Ray Ryan
Kill it! KI ITTT! -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Proposed API Change - Remove HTTPRequest

2010-02-04 Thread John LaBanca
Description: == HTTPRequest has been deprecated since GWT 1.5 in exchange for RequestBuilder. I propose that we remove HTTPRequest from the API completely. Why the sudden interest in axing code? == HTTPRequest has a bug that causes IE8 to show a popup error me

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1: is the history support iframe now mandatory ?

2010-02-04 Thread David
Hi, No as far as I know I have not referenced it anywhere. It used to work with 2.0, I was trying out the 2.0.1 build to see if the bugs I reported where correctly fixed, but I seem to stumble on multiple issues. I am not the only person poking around the codebase (we are forced to use a ClearCase

Re: [gwt-contrib] Announcing GWT 2.0.1

2010-02-04 Thread John LaBanca
Another important change that we forgot to mention is that *new applications created by webAppCreator now default to standards mode* instead of quirks mode. This makes it easier for new apps to take advantage of the new LayoutPanels, introduced in GWT 2.0, which only work in standards mode. Howev

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: TextBoxBase to implement HasDirection instead of its children

2010-02-04 Thread Ray Ryan
I more wanted to hear an elaboration on "I'm going to add some BiDi functionality to TextBox and TextArea." But given that Both of TA and TB implement the interface, refactoring the copy/paste implementation sounds good to me. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:01 AM, tomerigo wrote: > I want TextBoxBase

[gwt-contrib] GWT build requirements and packaging for Fedora

2010-02-04 Thread jlaska
Greetings, I previously attempted to post this to the general 'google-web- toolkit' group. However, I thought this group might be a more appropriate setting. I am looking into packaging GWT for Fedora. According to the Fedora packaging guidelines, all packages must not include any bundled libra

[gwt-contrib] Re: TextBoxBase to implement HasDirection instead of its children

2010-02-04 Thread tomerigo
I want TextBoxBase to implement HasDirection, which means moving the implementation of setDirection and getDirection from TextBox / TextArea to TextBoxBase. On 2 פברואר, 23:00, Ray Ryan wrote: > Extending TextBoxBase sounds perfectly reasonable, but what exactly are you > proposing to implement t

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r7530 committed - Fixed a broken link to "What's new in 1.5.0" and added a link to "What...

2010-02-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 7530 Author: d...@google.com Date: Thu Feb 4 06:19:20 2010 Log: Fixed a broken link to "What's new in 1.5.0" and added a link to "What's new in 2.0" Don't have a link to these distro release notes, but do have a link to the copy in the codesite release notes: http://code.google.com

Re: [gwt-contrib] Announcing GWT 2.0.1

2010-02-04 Thread Arthur Kalmenson
Great job! Some nice bug squishing. -- Arthur Kalmenson 2010/2/2 Miguel Méndez : > The GWT 2.0.1 point release is now available for download. It contains fixes > for bugs found in the 2.0.0 release. > > Potentially breaking changes and fixes > > Fixed a bug in how code generators collect method

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1 breaks incubator 2.0 ... is a new release emminent ?

2010-02-04 Thread Ray Ryan
And the jar is posted. All better? On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Ray Ryan wrote: > Sorry, we'll get a 2.0.1 incubator jar up today. > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:04 AM, stuckagain wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The changes to CurrencyData and CurrencyList as described in the >> release note of GWT 2.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r7529 committed - Use the getText() from SuggestBox instead of the one present in the Te...

2010-02-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 7529 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Thu Feb 4 04:43:03 2010 Log: Use the getText() from SuggestBox instead of the one present in the TextBoxBase implementation. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132812/show Patch by: manolo.carrasco Review by: jlabanca http://code.google.com/p

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r7528 committed - Fixes RichTextArea.isEnabled/setEnabled functionality so that it actua...

2010-02-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 7528 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Thu Feb 4 04:42:51 2010 Log: Fixes RichTextArea.isEnabled/setEnabled functionality so that it actually enables/disables the text area. Patch by: manolo.carrasco Review by: jlabanca Issue: 1488 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1: is the history support iframe now mandatory ?

2010-02-04 Thread Joel Webber
It shouldn't be -- if you kick off History's static initializer, it will GWT.create(HistoryImpl.class), and thus attempt to find the iframe, but I believe it's been this way for a long time. Are you sure you're not referencing History somewhere? On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, stuckagain wrote:

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1: is the history support iframe now mandatory ?

2010-02-04 Thread stuckagain
Hi, I rebuild my apps with 2.0.1 and noticed that they no longer start. In DevMode is see an error about the History Support that fails to initialize. My apps do not support history, so I did not include the IFrame... has this become mandatory or is this a little oops ? David -- http://groups.

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1 breaks incubator 2.0 ... is a new release emminent ?

2010-02-04 Thread Ray Ryan
Sorry, we'll get a 2.0.1 incubator jar up today. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:04 AM, stuckagain wrote: > Hi, > > The changes to CurrencyData and CurrencyList as described in the > release note of GWT 2.0.1 has impact on the current GWT incubator > CurrencyWidget. Is there a new release planned ? It

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on DataBackedWidgetsDesign in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by j...@google.com: @andrew: We'll definitely need to deal with some kind of selection model -- any comments you have about what you dislike about Swing's model would be helpful. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DataBackedWidgetsDesign -- http

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1 breaks incubator 2.0 ... is a new release emminent ?

2010-02-04 Thread stuckagain
Hi, The changes to CurrencyData and CurrencyList as described in the release note of GWT 2.0.1 has impact on the current GWT incubator CurrencyWidget. Is there a new release planned ? It seems to be fixed in the trunk of incubator. This is the compilation error. [ERROR] Errors in 'jar:file:/W:/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on DataBackedWidgetsDesign in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by georgopoulos.georgios: What do you think about the Provider/Resolver model used by JBuilder/DataExpress: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/10149 A simple implementation based on a MutableTableModel could be: http://pastebin.com/m3272f375 by default it works with an ArrayList (cli