[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on ValueStoreAndRequestFactory in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-15 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by andrew.pietsch: Just a quick note before I've had a chance to dig deeper - [http://code.google.com/p/gwt-pectin/ pectin] abstracts where the data comes from using a value model so isn't really concerned with how it comes and goes as long as it's can be adapted to a value model.

[gwt-contrib] Re: now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2010-02-15 Thread skrat
Allow UiBinder to use any ClientBundle in embedded ui:style CSS, so I can reuse my images actually, can't believe it's not working. On Dec 17 2009, 3:25 pm, FDG fdigiuse...@gmail.com wrote: - remove actual UiBinder limitations - supports printing using css media (so wrap themes around a @media

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on ValueStoreAndRequestFactory in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-15 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by nwwells: The wave is working now. Thanks! For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ValueStoreAndRequestFactory -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on ValueStoreAndRequestFactory in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-15 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by sami.jaber: @Ray Ok I understand your async constraints. Let's have look at it when you get back. Sami For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ValueStoreAndRequestFactory -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.2 still broken when there is no history.

2010-02-15 Thread stuckagain
People, Somehow testings needs to be a bit enhanced. GWT 2.0.2 which is supposed to fix issue 4585 does not seem to work correctly. Although the original stack is no longer produced when showing the popup, I now get the stack when closing down the PopupPanel. Can this bug be re-opened ?

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

2010-02-15 Thread Ray Ryan
That should work already. Are you using @UiField(provided - true)? Please file an issue with details. rjrjr On Feb 15, 2010 3:36 AM, skrat dusan.malia...@gmail.com wrote: Allow UiBinder to use any ClientBundle in embedded ui:style CSS, so I can reuse my images actually, can't believe it's not

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Scheduler vs. DeferredCommand

2010-02-15 Thread John LaBanca
I believe there is one other difference, but somebody else on the team will have to confirm. DeferredCommand uses a timeout of 0, which means that the command executes AFTER the current event loop finishes. Scheduler.scheduleEntry/scheduleFinally are executed within the event loop, immediately

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.2 still broken when there is no history.

2010-02-15 Thread Joel Webber
[+jlabanca: can you take a look at this?] On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:06 AM, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote: People, Somehow testings needs to be a bit enhanced. GWT 2.0.2 which is supposed to fix issue 4585 does not seem to work correctly. Although the original stack is no longer

Re: [gwt-contrib] Feature Request: VisibilityEvent

2010-02-15 Thread Joel Webber
I'm not sure if it's possible to do this correctly in the general case. You can currently override setVisible(), but that only works if it's called explicitly. Most importantly, there's no way I know of to get the DOM to tell you when an element becomes visible/hidden; to synthesize this would

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.2 still broken when there is no history.

2010-02-15 Thread John LaBanca
I'm already working on it. He's correct, there is still an NPE. I'll fix it immediately. Thanks, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote: [+jlabanca: can you take a look at this?] On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:06 AM, stuckagain

[gwt-contrib] PopupPanel NPE when history disabled

2010-02-15 Thread jlabanca
Reviewers: jgw, Description: PopupPanel.setState throws an NPE when history is disabled because the HandlerRegistration for the History handler is null. Fix: We now check that HandlerRegistration is not null. Testing: Added a unit test to test this case. Please review this at

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r7584 committed - Updating release notes for GWT 2.0.3.

2010-02-15 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 7584 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Mon Feb 15 06:32:20 2010 Log: Updating release notes for GWT 2.0.3. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7584 Modified: /trunk/distro-source/core/src/release_notes.html === ---

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r7585 committed - tr...@7583,7584 was merged into this branch...

2010-02-15 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 7585 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Mon Feb 15 10:18:07 2010 Log: tr...@7583,7584 was merged into this branch PopupPanel NPE fix and updated release notes for 2.0.3. svn merge -c7583,7584 --ignore-ancestry https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk

Re: [gwt-contrib] Feature Request: VisibilityEvent

2010-02-15 Thread Jarrod Carlson
Yes, there are some serious hurdles to being able to support this kind of feature. I haven't tried it yet, but I suggested the feature because I understand both Mozilla and WebKit support a DOMAttrModified sort of native event:

[gwt-contrib] Comment on DeferredCommandOptimization in google-web-toolkit

2010-02-15 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by yesufadem: how nice For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DeferredCommandOptimization -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors