[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on LightweightCollections in google-web-toolkit

Comment by rj...@google.com: Given the goal of "Collections must be able to be eval()-ed into existence from JSON," I hope their JRE counterparts will be able to serialize to JSON. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/LightweightCollections -- http://groups

[gwt-contrib] Re: RequestFactory prototype: Initial code that uses org.json lib on the server side

(I created this rietveld issue for you, so the reviewer field is a bit backwards — should be me.) http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/160809/diff/1/2 File bikeshed/.classpath (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/160809/diff/1/2#newcode10 Line 10: I thought you had added this to svn/too

[gwt-contrib] RequestFactory prototype: Initial code that uses org.json lib on the server side

Reviewers: Ray Ryan, Description: Initial code that uses org.json lib on the server side, passes actual request parameters, plus integration with server side domain objects. patch by amitman...@google.com review by rj...@google.com Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1608

[gwt-contrib] Re: UIObject methods return type improvement.

Thanks for your Reply Joel. Im happy to see this will be at leaset taken into consideration. I underestand your point of view. I think since this methods return nothing, maybe is not that problematic to implement a nice return. Only signature problems will occur on subclasses, nothing a simple ref