Sure, I can take a look at it tomorrow morning.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:11 PM, wrote:
> Ray, any chance of you getting to this tonight? If not, Amit, maybe you
> can take it in the morning?
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/389802/show
>
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-T
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/389802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Ray, any chance of you getting to this tonight? If not, Amit, maybe you
can take it in the morning?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/389802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Simplifies ActivityManager a bit, and adds a JRE unit test -- not
least to prove that they're possible.
Review by: cromwell...@google.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/389802/show
Affected files:
M /bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/422801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: Ray Ryan,
Description:
Fixed inclusion of json2.js in the html files
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: rjrjr (desk review)
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/394802/show
Affected files:
M trunk/bikeshed/war/ExpensesCustomized.html
M trunk/bikeshed/war/Expen
Reviewers: amitmanjhi,
Description:
We no longer restrict properties to a tinay arbitrary white list, but
we're still ignoring the property list the client requests -- we just
send everything. Except "password," as I've seen too many systems
accidentally expose passwords. We'll get to a real solu
Revision: 7991
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Tue Apr 27 07:18:58 2010
Log: Restore missing file from Rodrigo's rollback
Review by: rchan...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7991
Added:
/branches/2.1/bikeshed/test/com/google/gwt/collections/ObjectArrayTest.j
Revision: 7989
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 14:40:26 2010
Log: Updated the app code to use UiBinder for Employee/Report details and
Employee edits.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: rjrjr (desk review)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7989
Added:
Revision: 7988
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 13:43:11 2010
Log: Adding util to the source path in App.gwt.xml.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7988
Modified:
/branches/2.1/bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/app/App.gwt.xml
===
Revision: 7987
Author: rchan...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 12:38:54 2010
Log: Reverting CL15463571
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/363801/show
Review by: j...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7987
Deleted:
/branches/2.1/bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/coll
Revision: 7986
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Apr 27 13:53:13 2010
Log: Fix accidental checkstyle break in uibinder test land
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7986
Modified:
/branches/2.1/user/test/com/google/gwt/uibinder/test/client/Specific.java
Revision: 7985
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 11:09:26 2010
Log: Some files in the branch got truncated rather than deleted
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7985
Deleted:
/branches/2.1/bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/PlaceChanged.java
/branche
Revision: 7984
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 10:59:53 2010
Log: Unifies temp local tracking under a shared base visitor.
- All temps now definitely get their own JDeclarationStatement inserted
into the AST at the appropriate point.
- Temp locals are never reused anymore; however,
Revision: 7983
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 10:57:24 2010
Log: ServletValidator disable external DTD resolution.
Copied some code from ReflectiveParser that should disable external
entities when reading web.xml.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/371801/show
Review by: rdayal
Revision: 7982
Author: rchan...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 10:16:20 2010
Log: MutableArray and ImmutableArray JSNI implementation.
Organized tests into client-side and sever-side tests and test suites.
(at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/363801/show)
Review by: r...@google.com
http://code.g
Revision: 7980
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 09:03:43 2010
Log: Add paging/scrolling for tables
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/400801
Review by: jlaba...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7980
Added:
/branches/2.1/bikeshed/src/co
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/363801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2010/04/27 17:30:52, jlabanca wrote:
LGTM, but you're going to have some merge conflicts with the ViewData
nuking patch I just committed.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/398802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Templating the Expenses sample.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/398802/show
Affected files:
M /bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/bikeshed/style/client/common.css
M /bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/gwt/ExpensesCommon.gwt.xm
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/341803/diff/26001/27009
File user/src/com/google/gwt/logging/client/HasWidgetsLogHandler.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/341803/diff/26001/27009#newcode65
user/src/com/google/gwt/logging/client/HasWidgetsLogHandler.java:65: if
(formatter inst
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/420801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
If that's the main use case, then I agree. The reason I brought it up was
because App Engine also does its own validation of the web.xml file, so it
seemed like we were doing double-work here.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Scott Blum wrote:
> I think that would just make things more complicat
Reviewers: fabbott,
Description:
Test patch.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/420801/show
Affected files:
M /bikeshed/README
Index: /bikeshed/README
===
--- /bikeshed/README(revision 7979)
+++ /bik
Revision: 7979
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Mon Apr 26 12:07:45 2010
Log: The gflow constant analyzer assumes that parameters
could initially hold anything, rather than assuming
they haven't been initialized. This caused problems
for code like:
foo(String param) {
if (something) {
param = null
Revision: 7978
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Apr 27 08:23:57 2010
Log: Updates the list of aggressive optimizations to be those
added within the last year.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/406801
Review by: sco...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/so
Committed at r7925.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/353801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Dear all!
i tried the described RPC prefetching mechanism and i am facing one
problem:
first, on the server-side to serialize/RPC.encode(...) i need the
serialization policy, but i need the strong name to get it from the
RemoteService. so i am just using a dummy serialization policy that
seems to
29 matches
Mail list logo
