Comment by audiobrian:
The reason of the breakpoints issue, is that maybe you has configured a JRE
and not a JDK. But now I have a question for you. Why you're using Tomcat
with GWT?
Greetings.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/TroubleshootingOOPHM
--
> What version of the DataNucleus libraries to you have installed?
Here's what's in the auto-generated project pom.xml file:
datanucleus-appengine - 1.0.7.final
datanucleus-core - 1.1.6
datanucleus-jpa - 1.1.5
datanucleus-rdbms - 1.1.6
datanucleus-enhancer- 1.1.4
maven-datanucleus-plugin - 1.1.4
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
> Do you agree that we would still have a NumberParser even with the
>> renderers?
>>
>
> Uh, what?
>
>
> *NumberParser => NumberCell
>
I'm not sure I do, actually. It may be easy enough to do new
ValueCell(new NumberParser()) that we could
Ready for another look.
By adding an actual @SingleJsoImpl annotation to act as a hint for
devmode, the impact on I18N's CurrencyData is pretty much a one-liner.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/473801/diff/5001/6004
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/JsValueGlue.java (right):
http:
FYI - jat only reviewed the NumberCell class
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:41 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
> Do you agree that we would still have a NumberParser even with the
>> renderers?
>>
>
> Uh, what?
>
>
> *NumberParser => NumberCell
>
> Thanks,
> John L
>
> Do you agree that we would still have a NumberParser even with the
> renderers?
>
Uh, what?
*NumberParser => NumberCell
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:29 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... are you
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:29 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
> Hmmm... are you suggesting a ValueCell/ValueInputCell that defers to a
> Renderer/Parser? Assuming you mean that we would have subclasses for each
> type as we do with ValueBox, I agree. But that means that we'll have a
> DateCell and Numb
Hmmm... are you suggesting a ValueCell/ValueInputCell that defers to a
Renderer/Parser? Assuming you mean that we would have subclasses for each
type as we do with ValueBox, I agree. But that means that we'll have a
DateCell and NumberCell anyway, so this patch can go in and we can add a
ValueCel
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/568801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Presuming you buy into the Renderer and Parser interfaces
in trunk/bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/input, could they be used to unify
NumberCell and DateCell?
input is still in bikeshed so we'd need to have the whole new-public-api
conversation. Maybe this CL can be the catalyst.
On Wed, May 26, 2010
Reviewers: Dan Rice,
Description:
Replacing CurrencyCell with generic NumberCell that uses NumberFormat.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/568801/show
Affected files:
M /bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/bikeshed/stocks/StocksCommon.gwt.xml
M /bikeshed/src/com/goog
LGTM with nits. No need to rereview if you like the suggested changes.
These changes will make SOYC a lot easier to understand.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/566801/diff/1/3
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/soyc/MakeTopLevelHtmlForPerm.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56
One initial problem is that it's failing to find the right DataNucleus
libraries:
ERROR DataNucleus.Plugin - Bundle "org.datanucleus.store.appengine" requires
"org.datanucleus" version "[1.0.4, 1.1.5.final)" but the resolved bundle has
version "1.0.7.final" which is outside the expected range.
Wh
Revision: 8214
Author: igork...@google.com
Date: Wed May 26 06:47:24 2010
Log: Redeclare interface method in the enum to work around a javac bug.
See http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6724345 for details.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/564801
http://code.google.co
Revision: 8213
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Wed May 26 09:12:50 2010
Log: Package annotations to avoid recompilation
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/563801
Review by: sp...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8213
Modified:
/branches/2.1
Reviewers: Lex,
Description:
Fixes a bug in the compile report dashboard where entries with same
sizes were
being swallowed. It also now attributes fields to the corresponding
packages,
and gives additional hints about what is broken down and what isn't.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-re
Well... HorizontalPanel is still useful in some instances, and we have no
way of providing the same behavior in a general way because CSS layout is a
bloody mess. I'd be ok with deprecating the others (StackPanel, TabPanel,
VerticalPanel, and DockPanel) though.
Le 26 mai 2010 11:36, Ray Ryan a éc
Looks good to me; thanks, Igor!
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/564801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Joel, can we @Deprecate all the redundant non-flow panels yet? It's getting
harder and harder for people to discover the right thing to do.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Joel Webber wrote:
> The FlowPanel (just a simple that leaves its children's styles
> unmodified) already allows you to d
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/563801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8212
Author: rchan...@google.com
Date: Wed May 26 04:38:31 2010
Log: Added benchmark task to ant in user/
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/547801
Review by: sp...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8212
Added:
/branches/2.1/user/test/c
The FlowPanel (just a simple that leaves its children's styles
unmodified) already allows you to do this. For the vertical case, this tends
to happen naturally with block-level children.
The horizontal case is trickier, however. Using float:left captures some,
but definitely not all cases (vertic
Reviewers: Lex,
Description:
Package annotations to avoid recompilation
Review by: sp...@google.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/563801/show
Affected files:
M /dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/soyc/package-info.java
M /user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/client
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/547801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The next GWT Developments, will have alternatives to the VerticalPanel
and HorizontalPanel, using no table tags??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tableless_web_design
For instance, the HorizontalPanel could have a alternative named
HorizontalFlowPanel, that instead of generate this code:
ce
2010/5/20 oatkinson
> I heard some rumblings about creating a new vm language that was
> basically a "puddle of java" called jribble. It was supposed to
> allows support for making GWT work on scala code. I have not seen
> much more about it. Has anyone heard anything? I would really love
> t
Just to let you know - as of v2.3.0, easyXDM can now offer transport/
RPC with <15ms transits with *no* server side dependencies for
IE6+,Opera 9+, Firefox 3+, Safari 4+ and Chrome 2+.
All you need is to include easyXDM in the two documents.
For GWT this could be used in the following manner
Brow
Revision: 8211
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Wed May 26 03:15:17 2010
Log: Added null checks to MenuItem.setSubMenu(null) so it doesn't throw an
NPE. Also made sure that the Accessibility HASPOPUP state is set to false
when the submenu is removed.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-tool
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/547801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
29 matches
Mail list logo
