[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9524 committed - Adds some documentation on TypeOracle and JType...

2011-01-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9524 Author: zun...@google.com Date: Tue Jan 11 19:35:02 2011 Log: Adds some documentation on TypeOracle and JType Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9524 Modified: /trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/

[gwt-contrib] Re: This change adds couple of things: (issue1251801)

2011-01-11 Thread meder
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1251801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: This change adds couple of things: (issue1251801)

2011-01-11 Thread meder
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1251801/diff/11001/12009 File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/server/rpc/XsrfTokenServiceServlet.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1251801/diff/11001/12009#newcode192 user/src/com/google/gwt/user/server/rpc/XsrfTokenServiceServlet.java:192: setCoo

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread jat
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/5001/6001 File plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/5001/6001#newcode105 plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h:105: if (isInt(variant)) { Yes, I would never expect modf to be faster than the cast, a

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/5001/6001 File plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/5001/6001#newcode105 plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h:105: if (isInt(variant)) { On 2011/01/12 00:43:50, fabiomfv wrote: my concern with thi

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Issue 5549: fix is/has support for boolean properties (issue1272801)

2011-01-11 Thread Ray Ryan
Do similar changes need to be made in Editor, and are you up for that? Bob, are you able to take this review? On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:01 AM, wrote: > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1272801/diff/1/3 > File user/src/com/google/gwt/autobean/server/BeanMethod.java (right): > > http://gwt-co

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move all TCK test to users/test so they are run by the continuos build. (issue1267801)

2011-01-11 Thread rchandia
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/diff/10001/11106 File user/test/org/hibernate/jsr303/tck/tests/constraints/application/TckTest.gwt.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/diff/10001/11106#newcode22 user/test/org/hibernate/jsr303/tck/tests/constraints/applicatio

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move all TCK test to users/test so they are run by the continuos build. (issue1267801)

2011-01-11 Thread nchalko
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/diff/10001/11106 File user/test/org/hibernate/jsr303/tck/tests/constraints/application/TckTest.gwt.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/diff/10001/11106#newcode22 user/test/org/hibernate/jsr303/tck/tests/constraints/application/TckT

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread fabiomfv
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/5001/6001 File plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/5001/6001#newcode105 plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h:105: if (isInt(variant)) { my concern with this is something I chatted with Jat a coupl

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move all TCK test to users/test so they are run by the continuos build. (issue1267801)

2011-01-11 Thread nchalko
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread Fabio Valbuena
Not sure I understand the question. what you mean by stock browser? there are other issues that need to be addressed by the browser for us to be able to have a fully functional plugin in android. as mentioned, the double issue is minor in and was addressed by changed made in the android version of

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread jat
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/5 File plugins/xpcom/JavaObject.cpp (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/5#newcode154 plugins/xpcom/JavaObject.cpp:154: if ((JS_GetStringEncodingLength(ctx, str) == 8) && !strncmp("toString", On 2011/01/11 21:22:30, jat wr

[gwt-contrib] Re: At application startup, assert that the specified user.agent selection property value indeed mat... (issue1278801)

2011-01-11 Thread fredsa
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1278801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread John Tamplin
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Fabio Valbuena wrote: > I have been using a 'custom' build android webkit with a couple of > workarounds and the double issue is actually quite minor in the android > case; I am using a change that works around the double issue. Right, but wouldn't this allow yo

[gwt-contrib] At application startup, assert that the specified user.agent selection property value indeed mat... (issue1278801)

2011-01-11 Thread fredsa
Reviewers: jat, Description: At application startup, assert that the specified user.agent selection property value indeed matches the expected value for the executing browser / user agent, thus avoid long hours debugging strange error messages when a single user agent compile, typically created f

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread Fabio Valbuena
I have been using a 'custom' build android webkit with a couple of workarounds and the double issue is actually quite minor in the android case; I am using a change that works around the double issue. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:17 PM, wrote: > LGTM > > This should solve Fabio's issue with the An

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/1/3 File plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/1/3#newcode105 plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h:105: // numerical variants out of V8. On 2011/01/11 21:17:27, jat wrote: Have we talked to them ab

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds some documentation on TypeOracle and JType (issue1268801)

2011-01-11 Thread scottb
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: [GWT Designer] Don't cache rebind results while design time (issue1275801)

2011-01-11 Thread jbrosenberg
On 2011/01/11 22:13:48, Konstantin.Scheglov wrote: In reality, as I can see from patch, there are no UiBinder specific check, just design-time check. But probably would be good to add UiBinder specific check to avoid unnecessary rebinding other classes. Yes, but the design-time check i

[gwt-contrib] Re: [GWT Designer] Don't cache rebind results while design time (issue1275801)

2011-01-11 Thread Konstantin . Scheglov
On 2011/01/11 18:00:42, jbrosenberg wrote: I'm not sure I understand the larger picture, but I think there are some issues with this approach. Perhaps we can connect up to discuss furtherHere are some of the main points to consider: 1. StandardRebindOracle should not know anything spe

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread jat
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/5 File plugins/xpcom/JavaObject.cpp (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/5#newcode154 plugins/xpcom/JavaObject.cpp:154: if ((JS_GetStringEncodingLength(ctx, str) == 8) && !strncmp("toString", It might be worth doing

[gwt-contrib] Re: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread jat
LGTM This should solve Fabio's issue with the Android browser as well, right? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/1/3 File plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1277801/diff/1/3#newcode105 plugins/npapi/NPVariantWrapper.h:105: // numerical v

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/4 File plugins/xpcom/FFSessionHandler.h (left): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/4#oldcode71 plugins/xpcom/FFSessionHandler.h:71: inline Debug::DebugStream& operator<<(Debug::DebugStream& dbg, JSString* str) { On 2011/01/11 21:

[gwt-contrib] Re: [GWT Designer] Use per ClassLoader ModuleDef caching (issue1274801)

2011-01-11 Thread alexander . mitin
After a very hot local discussion :) we came to conclusion that we don't need CCLM to maintain ModuleDefs cache and can use HARD,SOFT map for top-level cache and ordinary map for moduleName->ModuleDef cache. I'll upload a new patch shortly. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1274801/show -- htt

[gwt-contrib] fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) (issue1277801)

2011-01-11 Thread conroy
Reviewers: jat, fabiomfv, Description: fix for NPVariant numbers. (new webkit v8 bindings give us doubles for ints) Issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5778 Breaking WebKit change: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/72974 Please review this at http://gwt-code-revi

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update the xpcom plugin for Gecko 2.0 (FF4). Only tested on Linux so far. (issue1269801)

2011-01-11 Thread jat
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/4 File plugins/xpcom/FFSessionHandler.h (left): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1269801/diff/1/4#oldcode71 plugins/xpcom/FFSessionHandler.h:71: inline Debug::DebugStream& operator<<(Debug::DebugStream& dbg, JSString* str) { Why remove

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9521 committed - Creating releases/2.2

2011-01-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9521 Author: p...@google.com Date: Tue Jan 11 12:44:47 2011 Log: Creating releases/2.2 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9521 Added: /releases/2.2 -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move the validation test cases that depend on reflection out of a client-scoped package. (issue1276801)

2011-01-11 Thread Ray Ryan
They are, Rietveld is just lame On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:09 AM, wrote: > LGTM, > except these should be moves not adds, to preserve history. > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1276801/show > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds some documentation on TypeOracle and JType (issue1268801)

2011-01-11 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801/diff/7001/1003 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JType.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801/diff/7001/1003#newcode24 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JType.java:24: * Returns this type with no type ann

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds some documentation on TypeOracle and JType (issue1268801)

2011-01-11 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: [GWT Designer] Use per ClassLoader ModuleDef caching (issue1274801)

2011-01-11 Thread Konstantin . Scheglov
On 2011/01/11 16:21:50, scottb wrote: Generally, can you justify this scheme? I read the article, but I still don't understand the advantage of this approach over say, Map ?> where the key is weak. Problem happens when you have reference from "value" to "key". For example, if you try t

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move the validation test cases that depend on reflection out of a client-scoped package. (issue1276801)

2011-01-11 Thread nchalko
LGTM, except these should be moves not adds, to preserve history. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1276801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move all TCK test to users/test so they are run by the continuos build. (issue1267801)

2011-01-11 Thread rchandia
The module definitions need some more work now that the super source files are in test-super http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/diff/10001/11106 File user/test/org/hibernate/jsr303/tck/tests/constraints/application/TckTest.gwt.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/di

[gwt-contrib] Move the validation test cases that depend on reflection out of a client-scoped package. (issue1276801)

2011-01-11 Thread bobv
Reviewers: rjrjr, Nick Chalko, Description: Move the validation test cases that depend on reflection out of a client-scoped package. This will remove a spurious compile error. Fix MinValidatorForStringTest. Patch by: bobv Review by: rjrjr, nchalko Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move all TCK test to users/test so they are run by the continuos build. (issue1267801)

2011-01-11 Thread nchalko
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1267801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: [GWT Designer] Don't cache rebind results while design time (issue1275801)

2011-01-11 Thread jbrosenberg
I'm not sure I understand the larger picture, but I think there are some issues with this approach. Perhaps we can connect up to discuss furtherHere are some of the main points to consider: 1. StandardRebindOracle should not know anything specific about a specific generator, so SRO is not th

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds some documentation on TypeOracle and JType (issue1268801)

2011-01-11 Thread scottb
Mostly LGTM. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801/diff/7001/1003 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JType.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1268801/diff/7001/1003#newcode24 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JType.java:24: * Returns this type wi

[gwt-contrib] Re: [GWT Designer] Use per ClassLoader ModuleDef caching (issue1274801)

2011-01-11 Thread scottb
Generally, can you justify this scheme? I read the article, but I still don't understand the advantage of this approach over say, Map where the key is weak. Functionally, the biggest problem is that it looks like we were holding ModuleDefs with soft references, but now they're being held with we

[gwt-contrib] TimePicker/Spinner bug

2011-01-11 Thread jbroquefere
Hi, we are using a TimePicker with maxStep/minStep set to 5mn (for the minutes only, we keep 1hour for hours). It's works exactly as expected BUT, sometimes (often, must I say) if we firstly click spinner down, the decrement is not of 5mn but 1mn. Then, if we up/down, the 5 step is used. Is this bu

[gwt-contrib] Optimizations for server-side invocations of CustomFieldSerializers. (issue1273801)

2011-01-11 Thread mchaston
Reviewers: jat, Description: Optimizations for server-side invocations of CustomFieldSerializers. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1273801/show Affected files: A user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/rpc/CustomFieldSerializer.java M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cli