[gwt-contrib] Re: Move GAE Auth functionality from Expenses over the MobileWebApp sample. (issue1829803)

2012-09-14 Thread rdayal
On 2012/09/14 18:53:22, rdayal wrote: I think this one is going to be pushed past GWT 2.5; that's ok though. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Removed the instance method get(Element element) method from the (issue1831803)

2012-09-14 Thread t . broyer
My 2 c€nts http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1831803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/aria/client/Roles.java File user/src/com/google/gwt/aria/client/Roles.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1831803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/aria/client/Roles.java#newcode137 user/src/com/goo

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move GAE Auth functionality from Expenses over the MobileWebApp sample. (issue1829803)

2012-09-14 Thread rdayal
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update Maven sample pom.xml files to use maven-compiler-plugin's annotation processing functiona... (issue1828803)

2012-09-14 Thread rdayal
On 2012/09/14 14:37:01, rdayal wrote: Pair-reviewed by drfibonacci and rdayal. LGTM. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add experimental GWT.unloadModule() function. (issue1827804)

2012-09-14 Thread Brian Slesinsky
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, wrote: > > I haven't quite figured out why, but actually code like this does seem > to cause a memory leak in Chrome. It essentially causes V8 to retain the > entire (textual) JS source of your program in memory, I think so that if > you debug a breakpoint, the D

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add experimental GWT.unloadModule() function. (issue1827804)

2012-09-14 Thread cromwellian
Hey Thomas, great comments, thanks. I will update the patch shortly with fixes. One issue is that V8 doesn't seem to be as great at GC as I thought, and I'm going to have to speak to the Chrome team. I thought originally that anything not reachable from GC roots would ultimately be collected, but

[gwt-contrib] Re: Removed the instance method get(Element element) method from the (issue1831803)

2012-09-14 Thread skybrian
LGTM. Thanks! http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1831803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move GAE Auth functionality from Expenses over the MobileWebApp sample. (issue1829803)

2012-09-14 Thread Rajeev Dayal
Hey Thomas, Thanks for looking this over. I'll reply to the code-specific comments in Rietveld itself, but I thought I'd respond to your more pressing concerns first. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, wrote: > I'm sorry I've only started to review the files (over the last few days) > but I have

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move GAE Auth functionality from Expenses over the MobileWebApp sample. (issue1829803)

2012-09-14 Thread t . broyer
I'm sorry I've only started to review the files (over the last few days) but I have a first question/comment about where this is going: There are many things that are not needed in the case of MobileWebApp as the host page is protected behind authentication. Because the user won't ever see this p

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move GAE Auth functionality from Expenses over the MobileWebApp sample. (issue1829803)

2012-09-14 Thread rdayal
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update Maven sample pom.xml files to use maven-compiler-plugin's annotation processing functiona... (issue1828803)

2012-09-14 Thread rdayal
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move GAE Auth functionality from Expenses over the MobileWebApp sample. (issue1829803)

2012-09-14 Thread drfibonacci
Upgrade GAE version http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829803/diff/4001/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml File samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829803/diff/4001/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml#newcode21 samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml:21: 1.5.3 Upgrade to 1.7.1

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add experimental GWT.unloadModule() function. (issue1827804)

2012-09-14 Thread t . broyer
Possibly related: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1821 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1827804/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.java File user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1827804/diff/1/user/