Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: KineticGWT

2012-11-16 Thread Kevin Zhang
Thx. It's fixed after I moved to latest gwt. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > Are you still using GWT 1.7.1? > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13357567/kineticgwt-the-import-com-google-gwt-canvas-cannot-be-resolved > > Also, this group is for discussion around contri

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move non-GWTTestCase tests in RpcSuite to RpcSuiteNoBrowser, (issue1868803)

2012-11-16 Thread Brian Slesinsky
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > Should we rename the *JreSuite in e.g. RequestFactory to *SuiteNoBrowser > too? I kind of like this naming scheme, easier to deal with than *Suite vs. > *JreSuite. Good point, I hadn't seen those. Yes I like my name better :-) - Brian --

[gwt-contrib] Re: KineticGWT

2012-11-16 Thread Thomas Broyer
Are you still using GWT 1.7.1? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13357567/kineticgwt-the-import-com-google-gwt-canvas-cannot-be-resolved Also, this group is for discussion around contributions to the GWT codebase; for support regarding the use of GWT, please use https://groups.google.com/d/foru

[gwt-contrib] Re: Move non-GWTTestCase tests in RpcSuite to RpcSuiteNoBrowser, (issue1868803)

2012-11-16 Thread Thomas Broyer
Should we rename the *JreSuite in e.g. RequestFactory to *SuiteNoBrowser too? I kind of like this naming scheme, easier to deal with than *Suite vs. *JreSuite. On Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:42:48 PM UTC+1, Brian Slesinsky wrote: > > Reviewers: mdempsky, > > Description: > Move non-GWTTestC