Ray, are these public methods used at all by custom linkers or any other
user code?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1902803/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit
Brian Slesinsky has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Add callbacks to Super Dev Mode to find out when a compile
starts and finishes, and an alternate main() that can be called after
parsing options.
..
Abandoned
Sub
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add callbacks to Super Dev Mode to find out when a compile
starts and finishes, and an alternate main() that can be called after
parsing options.
..
Patch
On 2013/04/17 23:12:34, mdempsky wrote:
Face palm.
(And that's at the typos being overlooked for so long, not at the
patch!)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1902803/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscri
Face palm.
Does this break backwards compatibility at all? E.g., are any of the
permuation methods user accessible? Do we need to add @Deprecated
forwarding methods for them?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1902803/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
LGTM.
I can not believe that this was not caught by anyone before.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1902803/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit Contributors" g
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Fixes ISSUE 7079 - Add support for the newer bindery
HandlerRegistration
..
Patch Set 1: Verified+1
Hoorays, this change passed presubmit. :D More details
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Removes api-checker reference JARs from the source tree.
..
Patch Set 1: Verified-1
Oops, this change failed presubmit. :( More details at
--
To view, visit
On 2013/04/17 21:10:31, stalcup wrote:
LGTM.
BTW, we are using gwt-review.googlesource.com
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1901803/
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google We
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add callbacks to Super Dev Mode to find out when a compile
starts and finishes, and an alternate main() that can be called after
parsing options.
..
Patch
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:17:25 PM UTC+2, James Horsley wrote:
>
> Hey Thomas,
>
> Totally understand that modularization and mavenization are top priorities
> but does that mean my Map support patch need to wait until after GWT 2.6?
>
I'm afraid it'll have to; or put differently I can't
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add explicit assertNonNull() statements to JSONTest for
cleaner test failures.
..
Patch Set 1: Verified-1
testing
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.goo
Thanks Andrew & John!
Yes, agreed. Having RTL-aware methods makes sense:
setWidgetPosition => sets left for backward compatibility
setWidgetLeftPosition => sets left
setWidgetRightPosition => sets right
setWidgetLineStartPosition => sets left if LTR, right if RTL
setWidgetLineEnd
DockLayoutPanel separates line_start from west, and it seems like it
would be appropriate to separate line_start from left in this situation.
This way would be backwards compatible.
To fix the problem in the description, it would be necessary to add a
new RTL-aware add method, similar to DockLay
Roberto Lublinerman has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Avoid creating anonymous inner classes with wildcard type
parameters.
..
Abandoned
Submitted, thanks!
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/247
On 2013/04/17 17:21:49, goktug wrote:
On 2013/04/17 05:14:32, yaminik wrote:
Reviewers needed.
I don't have much experience with RTL issues. At least this change
will very
likely break any previous code that was not assuming the different
behavior for
RTL in AbsolutePanel.
I would lo
On 2013/04/17 05:14:32, yaminik wrote:
Reviewers needed.
I don't have much experience with RTL issues. At least this change will
very likely break any previous code that was not assuming the different
behavior for RTL in AbsolutePanel.
I would love to hear what you guys think.
http://gwt-code-
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new patch set (#7).
Change subject: Avoid creating anonymous inner classes with wildcard type
parameters.
..
Avoid creating anonymous inner classes with wildcard type parameters.
Under Java
Roberto Lublinerman has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Fix non deterministic behaviour in TypeTightener.
..
Abandoned
Submitted, thanks!
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2530
To unsubscribe, visit
Hey Thomas,
Totally understand that modularization and mavenization are top priorities
but does that mean my Map support patch need to wait until after GWT 2.6? I
know things have been in a transitional period but I submitted the patch
almost a year ago now and would love to get the support in; le
James Nelson has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add callbacks to Super Dev Mode to find out when a compile
starts and finishes, and an alternate main() that can be called after
parsing options.
..
Patch Se
21 matches
Mail list logo
