> Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode for a Google team
I would be nice to hear how this was done on such large projects as Google
has. I try with out application (170k LOC of client code / GWT-RPC, etc.)
and it took 2x-3x more time then DevMode.
On Thursday, August 8, 2013 1
AFAIK, JsDoc actually is more expressive than TypeScript, for example, TS
doesn't currently support union types IIRC, which is critical for
expressing real world Javascript libraries. It is also a form of repeating
yourself to specify a TS file, because a Javascript programmer writing his
library c
Ray:
I'm writing a design doc like "Nextgen GWT/JS Interop", but for
"Relaxation of GWT.create()". I don't know if there are previous official
efforts to bring something like this to life, but if so, I would like know
about similar experiences.
Is there a guideline for these kind of design doc
Our largest projects aren't using Super Dev Mode yet for the same reason -
not fast enough yet. But it varies; we have a lot of smaller teams that
like it.
- Brian
On Friday, August 9, 2013 1:56:13 AM UTC-7, Matic Petek wrote:
>
> > Ray got automatic recompile working in Super Dev Mode for a Go
Hi, I've published a document [1] with my thoughts on some of the
GWT.create() proposals. This doesn't cover everything we've discussed but I
think it's a start. If you're on this mailing list you should be able to
comment.
- Brian
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MDqiBEMl7dylYliAceLBBxGFA
Andres,
You might want to wait a day or two. I think Brian started one by copy
and pasting your proposals and mine into a doc, it might be better for him
to make it public and we all hack on that.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Andrés Testi wrote:
> Ray:
>
> I'm writing a design doc like "N
I've published that doc here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MDqiBEMl7dylYliAceLBBxGFAlSvkQB9b-kSlnKmZBk/edit?disco=AGXNBZg#heading=h.gks1bp7hz61l
To clarify, I'm not myself working on any GWT.create() enhancements, but I
thought it was worth documenting my concerns in greater detail rath
I agree Brian, we first must know what we want.
- Andrés
El viernes, 9 de agosto de 2013 18:41:07 UTC-3, Brian Slesinsky escribió:
>
> I've published that doc here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MDqiBEMl7dylYliAceLBBxGFAlSvkQB9b-kSlnKmZBk/edit?disco=AGXNBZg#heading=h.gks1bp7hz61l
>
I think in the long-run we should separate the two concepts that is being
tackled by GWT.create today.
First purpose is the class replacement, especially used by permutations. I
think this one should not have anything to do with GWT.create. We can do
any class replacement in compiler without requi
