On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
> An example use-case would be implementing String.format when the format
> string is a compile-time constant. I had a proof of concept mostly working
> for this, but it was going to require more surgery to the compiler than I
> was willing
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM, John A. Tamplin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
>> Even though the current form is pretty flexible and you can mix and match
>> the two, it doesn't mean it makes sense to do so. I'm having hard time
>> thinking about out a good
Today, even GWT generator developers are having trouble debugging generated
code with -gen (just think GWTTestCase). It is not very practical for every
day usage of end users.
I don't know how well APT support of IDEs are today but that's something
that IDE's itself can improve upon and we can just
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
>
>>2. IDE support: IDE can trigger codegen (esp. for debugging)
>>>
>>
>> My experience with this has been pretty poor, and running GWT with -gen
>> is at least as useful.
>>
>
> Also, Super Dev Mode gives you access to all the generate
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:28 AM, John A. Tamplin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
>> I think in the long-run we should separate the two concepts that is being
>> tackled by GWT.create today.
>>
>> First purpose is the class replacement, especially used by permut
APT is missing mostly whole-world kind of informations in TypeOracle (e.g.
getAllSubTypes) but perhaps this is also advantage and that is why it help
the compiler to scale better :) Also looking at the usages
of getAllSubTypes it is not like a major deal if we replace GWT-RPC with
something that is
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
> Even though the current form is pretty flexible and you can mix and match
> the two, it doesn't mean it makes sense to do so. I'm having hard time
> thinking about out a good use case that would make a single complex mix and
> match more a
Even though the current form is pretty flexible and you can mix and match
the two, it doesn't mean it makes sense to do so. I'm having hard time
thinking about out a good use case that would make a single complex mix and
match more appealing than having a separate group of class replacements and
a
I did do some profiling and at the time it looked like a good 40% was spent
in the JDT. It will depend on the app though; I'm not satisfied I
understand the performance.
I've built some infrastructure for collecting better performance metrics
inside Google, but at the moment I've put that aside to
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rafiq Ahamed wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>Any thoughts on DropWizard framework (http://dropwizard.codahale.com/)
> as a backend for GWT. RESTFUL webservices is the way to go and I feel GWT
> RPC is an Anti-Pattern.
>
GWT RPC was never intended to be the solution to
Dear folks,
I have been a heavy GWT user for the past 4 years in a number of
projects. I have used M-GWT and it is great as well. Even though, I like
GWT/M-GWT, I dislike the usage of GWT RPC's. RESTFUL webservices
integration is the way to go so that the server side can be anything
includ
Dear Folks,
Any thoughts on DropWizard framework (http://dropwizard.codahale.com/)
as a backend for GWT. RESTFUL webservices is the way to go and I feel GWT
RPC is an Anti-Pattern.
And also, what about integrating ApacheCouchDB or ApacheSolr (Json style
Schema less 4.4 version) as a back
12 matches
Mail list logo
