We have not decided on a Java minimum version for GWT code with 3.0. Maybe
we go with an approach to leave server side code at Java 6 and may require
a newer version for the client side. This would allow us to leverage Java 8
features while still being able to run Java 6 server side.
On Nov 13, 201
I see. Thanks for the information.
-- J.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi All,
I then think that it is needed a patch to include guava-15.0-rebased.jar,
sourcemap-rebased.jar, protobuf-java-rebased-2.5.0.jar and
streamhtmlparser-jsilver-r10-1.5-rebased.jar in gwt-servlet.jar
The patch should be as easy as moving the following lines in
servlet/build.xml up within
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:41:12 PM UTC+1, Cristiano wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I then think that it is needed a patch to include guava-15.0-rebased.jar,
> sourcemap-rebased.jar, protobuf-java-rebased-2.5.0.jar and
> streamhtmlparser-jsilver-r10-1.5-rebased.jar in gwt-servlet.jar
>
No, not
Sounds like a reasonable proposal to me.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:41:12 PM UTC+1, Cristiano wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I then think that it is needed a patch to include guava-15.0-rebased.jar,
>> sourcemap-rebased.jar, protobu
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 13, 2013 5:41:12 PM UTC+1, Cristiano wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I then think that it is needed a patch to include guava-15.0-rebased.jar,
>> sourcemap-rebased.jar, protobuf-java-rebased-2.5.0.jar and
>> streamhtmlp
Ok,
I'll follow your indications,
I'll give it a try before pushing it and in case of surprises I'll come
back here to discuss.
Do you want me also to create an issue associated to this, for tracking
purposes?
Cristiano
Il giorno mercoledì 13 novembre 2013, Roberto Lublinerman ha scritto:
>
>
>
> Make the patch is easy, get the contributors to take a final decision is
> harder:
>
Given the patch is correct you get an instant +1 from me because I always
forget adding gwt-servlet-deps.jar until I see (the already well known)
exceptions ;-)
-- J.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Go
Uploaded the patch: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5400
I've tested it with "validation" sample, that now works with only
gwt-servlet,jar on the classpath,
and on "dynatable" examples plus 3 applications from my own with no visible
change.
Cristiano
--
http://groups.google.com/group
