Hello,
The newest @JsType feature is really very fascinating, and works in most
cases. The only issue i found was the wrong null.nullField javascript
output.
the compile command:
java -cp xxx com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler -war xxx -XnoclassMetadata
-XnocheckCasts -XjsInteropMode JS
Can you post the full source for CollaborativeOperation? My guess is
the UserID and SessionID fields are being proven by the compiler to be
uninstantiated types. Are userId/sessionId simple Strings, or some
other type?
.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:18 AM, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
We are planning to drop support for IE8 if the application doesn't inherit
c.g.gwt.useragent.UserAgent and hence not have browser permutations.
Nearly all of today's apps inherit User so they will not be affected by
this change. In the future more apps will only inherit Core however they
Hi Ray,
Here is the source for CollaborativeOperation:
https://github.com/goodow/realtime-operation/blob/master/src/main/java/com/goodow/realtime/operation/impl/CollaborativeOperation.java
the final project which depends on realtime-operation:
https://github.com/goodow/realtime-store (Using the
Hi Daniel,
I just tried the code you provided, unfortunately, the explicit class cast
workaround
does not solve this issue. The translated javascript code is the same as
before.
Thanks!
On Monday, June 30, 2014 11:18:12 PM UTC+8, Daniel Kurka wrote:
I have seen this happening before when
Sounds great, but is there a reason that we're now starting at IE9+ and not
IE10+, thus giving us typed arrays, web workers, web sockets, etc? I only
ask because the kind of case where you are giving up User (and Widget, RPC,
Timer, and other fairly high-level apis) seems to suggest that you
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds great, but is there a reason that we're now starting at IE9+ and
not IE10+, thus giving us typed arrays, web workers, web sockets, etc? I
only ask because the kind of case where you are giving up User (and Widget,
