Hi Ivan,
why would you want to edit the JavaScript instead of editing your Java code?
How long does your compile take with the current GWT 2.7 Snapshot?
-Daniel
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
(Background: I'm trying to further shorten the
Daniel,
I'm not planning to edit the generated JavaScript by hand. My idea is to
remove the need to do webapp *reloading*. The problem with reloading the
webapp is NOT that it takes a lot of time (it probably doesn't), but that
if the webapp is a stateful one, reloading it on each SDM
Ray,
Using the xs linker seems like a bad idea, as it combines the disadvantages
of sso and the xsiframe: :)
(a) Like xsiframe, it injects script tags in the document body via
JavaScript, which makes these script tags uneditable via Chrome LiveEdit
(b) Like sso, it uses the Module Pattern to
Thanks to all of you who participated to this very good things !
I am now able (from the trunk) to have a great experience debugging with
Gwt + Eclipse + Sdbg + Chrome.
I cannot be quantitatively very precise but the latest optimization
(-XcompilePerFile) seems to give good results. My project
Hi Arnaud,
are those 10s after the changes we made or before?
-Daniel
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all of you who participated to this very good things !
I am now able (from the trunk) to have a great experience debugging with
Gwt +
Basically the compile took 10s before and 9s now, but this is a very tiny
project, so that's why i am saying the improvement is here but not
quantitatively measurable on my particular project. I will send better
stats when working with bigger projects.
Thanks
Arnuad
2014-09-01 12:25 GMT+02:00
Hi guys,
I have just tried out the 2.7-SNAPSHOT. I have a fairly large multi-module
maven project.
For development, I am using STS 3.6, windows7, SSD, i7 3720qm 2.6Ghz,
Starting SuperDevmode:
Unification traversed 147422 fields and methods and 11825 types. 11773 are
considered part of the
Hi,
I would like to test new compile per file option, but we run our project
from Eclipse and we don't use Maven. So I have perform the following steps :
1) Download JAR files
from
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google-snapshots/com/google/gwt/
gwt-servlet.jar
gwt-user.jar
For now, I can run my app in Eclipse hosted mode with GWT 2.6.1 and run SDM
server with GWT 2.7 snaphost. It look nothing has change in GWT-RPC
protocol so it is working.
Regards,
Matic
On Monday, September 1, 2014 3:09:18 PM UTC+2, Matic Petek wrote:
Hi,
I would like to test new compile
you could try changing line 182 in Recompiler.java to register the std
linker
https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt.git/+/2.5.1/dev/codeserver/java/com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/Recompiler.java
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ray,
Using the xs linker seems
err, in master that would be
https://gwt.googlesource.com/gwt.git/+/master/dev/codeserver/java/com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/Recompiler.java
and line 327
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:58 PM, John Stalcup stal...@google.com wrote:
you could try changing line 182 in Recompiler.java to register the
Such a small time makes me think that you have particularly slow linkers.
What's the time split between compiling and linking?
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote:
Basically the compile took 10s before and 9s now, but this is a very tiny
project, so that's
12 matches
Mail list logo