Hi Luca,
we are intentionally not deploying right now, but we will eventually sort
this out. I am sorry but we do not have an ETA for that.
-Daniel
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:20 PM, luca.masini wrote:
> Can someone take the time to fix the problem with the CI system that
> prevent the jar to be
>
> we are intentionally not deploying right now, but we will eventually sort
> this out. I am sorry but we do not have an ETA for that.
>
Why is it intentionally and why will it only "eventually" be sorted out?
Whats going on?
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
If you can provide a small sample that reproduces the problem I will take a
look.
On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 3:09:32 PM confile
wrote:
> I use GWT 2.8 SnapShot with an app that runs with CSS only no GSS. Then I
> switched to GSS using:
>
>
>
>
>
> "lenient" />
>
>
> When I compile with option -st
Hi,
after I've managed to get ANT working I was trying to figure out how to
import all those projects into Eclipse.
I followed the instructions in trunk/eclipse/README.txt step by step and
finally I got a working workspace.
But I did some changes to the source where I don't know if I did somethin
You should revert all your code changes done in 1-3. All code is
intentional and the real problem is the Google Plugin for Eclipse which
does not understand JSNI shortcut notation and has some trouble with the
UiBinder test files. You can safely ignore these errors.
If these errors bug you then
@JsExport exports constructors and static members and pins them so they act
as entry points and not get pruned.
On the other hand, @JsType enforces generation of javascript compatible
prototype for the class so if there is a method named "someMethod" in the
Java object, same method with same name e
that makes sense. How would I apply the @JsExport and @JsType to a third
party library without forking it though?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:11 PM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors <
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> @JsExport exports constructors and static members a
We are going to introduce configuration file based exports in the future
however for now your best bet is to super-source the files and add
annotations that you need.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Joseph Gardi wrote:
> that makes sense. How would I apply the @JsExport and @JsType to a third
>
thanks. Sounds exciting.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:42 PM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors <
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> We are going to introduce configuration file based exports in the future
> however for now your best bet is to super-source the files and ad
I talked with Daniel at gwt.create about this topic and they have something
to fix and won't (or can) talk about this! :-(
But he provided a valid workaround for this - you could (very easy)
checkout the gwt sources (git) and the (gwt-)tools (svn) and build your own
jars.
I use targets clean a
10 matches
Mail list logo
