[gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade bundled jetty to 9.2.16.v20160414

2016-05-08 Thread Alexander Leshkin
воскресенье, 8 мая 2016 г., 23:07:37 UTC+3 пользователь Thomas Broyer написал: > > Not sure I understand your concern: Jetty is no longer bundled in gwt-dev > in 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT (Maven artifacts only) I mean gwt-dev from SDK which is used in eclipse plugin. -- You received this message

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Generator and Linker maintenance and changes

2016-05-08 Thread Colin Alworth
Thanks everyone. Since we don't really have much of a consensus on this, perhaps we can take some middle ground here? I certainly agree that we want people to move away from generators in general, though without finished solutions for some of the tricks generators can do, this will be tricky.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade bundled jetty to 9.2.16.v20160414

2016-05-08 Thread Thomas Broyer
Not sure I understand your concern: Jetty is no longer bundled in gwt-dev in 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT (Maven artifacts only) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade bundled jetty to 9.2.16.v20160414

2016-05-08 Thread Alexander Leshkin
воскресенье, 8 мая 2016 г., 10:47:36 UTC+3 пользователь Thomas Broyer написал: > > Is 9.2.16 API-compatible with 9.2.14? Unfortunately I don't have much experience with 9.2.x backward compatibility. But jetty 9.2.16 from custom GWT SDK build works well in our GWT applications. > What does

[gwt-contrib] Upgrade bundled jetty to 9.2.16.v20160414

2016-05-08 Thread Thomas Broyer
Is 9.2.16 API-compatible with 9.2.14? What does 9.2.16 bring to the table? (BTW, if using Maven artifacts, you can easily upgrade without rebuilding) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop