Great post Colin. You are "the voice of the people" here. I couldn't agree
more with the statement: "Finally, if we are *to be serious about this*, as
a GWT user, contributor, and steering committee member, I have to expect to
see usable solutions in the *near future* to move away from these too
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 7:51:45 AM UTC+2, Alexander Leshkin wrote:
>
> воскресенье, 8 мая 2016 г., 23:07:37 UTC+3 пользователь Thomas Broyer
> написал:
>>
>> Not sure I understand your concern: Jetty is no longer bundled in gwt-dev
>> in 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT (Maven artifacts only)
>
>
> I mean gwt-
OK, I understood.
Thank you.
понедельник, 9 мая 2016 г., 11:29:06 UTC+3 пользователь Thomas Broyer
написал:
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 7:51:45 AM UTC+2, Alexander Leshkin wrote:
>>
>> воскресенье, 8 мая 2016 г., 23:07:37 UTC+3 пользователь Thomas Broyer
>> написал:
>>>
>>> Not sure I un
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 5:39:36 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone. Since we don't really have much of a consensus on this,
> perhaps we can take some middle ground here?
>
> I certainly agree that we want people to move away from generators in
> general, though without finish
Sometimes I am not sure if we should use a normal or a critical check.
Basically my understanding is that we should use a normal check if the code
would also fail (but obviously with a JS error instead of a required Java
Exception) with an error if the check was not present. If the code would
f
Thanks for asking; I think I never explained this well.
This is mostly judgement call but in general the rule of thumb is:
- Assume no checks as the starting point
- Look at the code and see what will happen if we don't have the check:
- If the missing check will leave the object in a very brok
Konstantin:
You're correct that internally we use Blaze (which is open sourced as Bazel
at http://bazel.io/) and not Ant.
But even though most of our BUILD files (the build configuration that Blaze
uses) are included in the open source repo, some significant pieces are
missing (some referenced sc
I filed https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/1077 and it looks like
Bazel will include support for gwt_application.
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 2:59:36 PM UTC-4, John Stalcup wrote:
>
> Konstantin:
>
> You're correct that internally we use Blaze (which is open sourced as
> Bazel at http://ba
Hm ok, I think I got it. I would say my Arrays.sort() example should
actually use a critical check then because array.slice() can do lots
unexpected things (negative indexes for either argument works but results
an unexpected subset of array items to be sorted, toIndex can be larger
than fromIn
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jens wrote:
> Hm ok, I think I got it. I would say my Arrays.sort() example should
> actually use a critical check then because array.slice() can do lots
> unexpected things (negative indexes for either argument works but results
> an unexpected subset of array it
10 matches
Mail list logo
