Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread Learner Evermore
@James: I am interested and may be able to help if you open source it. However, there are integration issues with respect to GWT 3 noted above, in the rest of the thread. Please do read it when you have time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Con

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread James Nelson
Have not read the whole thread yet, but just wanted to point out a few small things. First, whole-world compilations and transforms are something I've been working on as a replacement for generator subsystem since I heard it was dying a couple years ago. I have a toy implementation working with

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread Learner Evermore
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 3:41:13 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > It indeed does use and from gwt.xml files to > subset/superset the compilation classpath, but it does *not* take the > EntryPoint into consideration; not at that point. > First generators are run and generate code, then o

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread Learner Evermore
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 4:06:25 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > Open-sourcing j2cl takes time (see > https://opensource.google.com/docs/releasing/ , we've been told it's > currently in the "getting approval" phase), more time than for > jsinterop-generator or elemental2. > But no work

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread Learner Evermore
> > > My point is simply if the Java->JS compiler is moving to separate > compilation, > Well, that is why we are having this discussion. > having hooks in it cannot help you if the things you want require > whole-world analysis. > It actually can, as I noted above, saving duplication of co

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 9:57:35 PM UTC+2, Learner Evermore wrote: > > J2Cl will be a Google project (not a GWT project; actually not dissimilar >> to how GWT currently leverages Eclipse JDT/ECJ, Jetty, etc.) but it'll be >> open source and accept external contributions too. >> > I didn't thi

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

2017-05-24 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 7:14:52 AM UTC+2, Learner Evermore wrote: > > ... continuing the above - there is more. Let's now come back to the > analysis part. Yes, it is possible to do the "whole-world analysis" outside > the compiler. But what perspective should the analysis take? It is >