Patch is accepted and merged into upstream HtmlUnit, see
https://sourceforge.net/p/htmlunit/bugs/1924/ for more detail.
Daniel, when you can take a look at Thomas's question, we can get this
change made to open source GWT as you requested.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 6:08:05 PM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote:
>
> Patch is accepted and merged into upstream HtmlUnit, see
> https://sourceforge.net/p/htmlunit/bugs/1924/ for more detail.
>
> Daniel, when you can take a look at Thomas's question, we can get this
> change made to open
I am not aware of anything specific we have done within Google, we never
imported the jetty upgrade. I think you just go ahead for open source and
make it work there. We do not care that much for htmlunit anymore within
Google.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:28 AM Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesd
I'll try with the manual runstyle, i.e. with a real browser, and see how it
goes. Thanks for the feedback.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to g
tbroyer: Are you using batch mode while testing? We are using -batch module
internally and maybe you guys do not externally? (though you linked the
code that only runs in batch mode, IIRC).
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> I'll try with the manual runstyle, i.e. with a rea