The main blocker for releasing J2CL for wider audience is even basic
missing functionalities around building it in open-source and seeing at
least some output for your compilations. That is blocked on missing
functionalities in bazel. After that we can probably finished in more
timely manner.
There
Goktug,
We don't want a polished experience. We want *some* experience. :)
Is there anything we can help with? BTW, I thought Bazel is already open
sourced and you are already building with it? What's the roadblock there?
BTW 2: Releasing a J2CL binary would also help, as long as that's somehow
I am *really* interested. Can you sign me up?
On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 9:13:01 AM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
> The main blocker for releasing J2CL for wider audience is even basic
> missing functionalities around building it in open-source and seeing at
> least some output for your com
Hello,
yes, definitely I would like to be in.
I am really interested.
Cheers,
Alberto.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:21 PM Nándor Előd Fekete
wrote:
> I am *really* interested. Can you sign me up?
>
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 9:13:01 AM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>>
>> The main blocker
> There is still tone of work to do for a polished open source experience
but at least we can give access to more people who is really interested.
What I meant here; is giving access *after* basic bazel stuff is finished
so there will be something to play with. We don't want to give access to a
br
