Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

2018-12-05 Thread Jens
> For the emulation changes I can live with what is available now and get > some more in a later release. But how does the gwt team decide which are > crucial and which ones can be done in a separate library ? The java.time > API should really be considered, the Date object has been

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

2018-12-05 Thread David Nouls
I am using var in some simple cases and the gwt compiler did not have a problem. I don’t use them on lambda parameters though. So my code is using   Java 10 but not 11 features. For the emulation changes I can live with what is available now and get some more in a later release. But how does

[gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

2018-12-05 Thread Jens
I think the JDT version GWT currently uses does not officially support Java 11. However Java 11 has no notable syntax changes except the var keyword for lambda parameters. So it might work, but maybe it doesn't. Have you tried running GWT with Java 11 and using that new syntax? Also no Java

[gwt-contrib] 2.9 progress

2018-12-05 Thread stuckagain
Now that j2cl is open sourced I see a lot of enthousiasm for working with it, which is great. But how does that impact 2.9 release with Java 11 support ? I don’t see a lot moving here: https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/milestone/19 We are going to release a product that is currently depending