Re: [gwt-contrib] Asking for decision on DevMode embedded Jetty support

2021-04-19 Thread Bernhard Schulz
Hi all! I am catching up on some statements in the last mails. > First, let me say that I both understand and sympathize for the cases Elias > describes: when you have sufficiently large team and/or project, even small > changes in workflow could be extremely painful. > No one likes that and I

Re: [gwt-contrib] Asking for decision on DevMode embedded Jetty support

2021-04-17 Thread Bernhard Schulz
ps.com > <mailto:google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/16974302-ff52-4fc0-bcf7-4c25356e708en%40googlegroups.com > > <http

[gwt-contrib] Re: Thurs Jun 18 2020 GWT Contributors call

2020-06-17 Thread Bernhard Schulz
Hi Frank! no, we don't do it this time, but plan it for the future. > Why not? Is this a technical issue? Or do you not want your Nalu-part recorded? (Which would be a pitty, since Nalu is very cool and I use it and can recommend it to everyone :-) If that really is the reason, maybe stop

[gwt-contrib] Re: Thurs Jun 18 2020 GWT Contributors call

2020-06-17 Thread Bernhard Schulz
Hi Colin & Co! We'll officially start at 5pm CEST / 11am EDT, though I'll plan to be on > for at least an hour before then. > That is great, unfortunately, I am busy at this date. So I am kindly asking if you could please record the session, so I (and others) can watch later. Also, by any

[gwt-contrib] Re: HashCode H$ property should be not enumerable

2020-06-14 Thread Bernhard Schulz
Hi! I think old browsers shouldn't be supported any more. If somebody needs them, they should use GWT 2.9.0, which is perfectly fine and works well now and in the future. But for future versions of GWT, drop support for old browsers so development can be focused on modern generations of