Is there a plan to fix the ValdiationTool (issue mentioned here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/lue7vRkkxU8
) for default and static methods in proxy interfaces? or is it already
fixed?
if one it should be documented as known issue with
the @SkipInterf
Hello Thomas,
thank you for the hint. I just found the @SkipInterfaceValidation
annotation in com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.
This compiles and works but if possible it would still be nice to have the
ValidationTool / APT-Processor updated for 2.8.0.
Thank you! :)
Am Freitag,
here is a small project to reproduce the issue:
https://github.com/issuerepro/gwt-rf-default-static
just run: mvnw compile
Am Freitag, 12. August 2016 08:00:30 UTC+2 schrieb Kay-Uwe Janssen:
>
> This issue is still present with RC2. :(
>
> I'll try to build a sm
This issue is still present with RC2. :(
I'll try to build a small repro project.
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 08:58:22 UTC+2 schrieb Kay-Uwe Janssen:
>
> > I just tested your example. THIS compiles and works but when trying to
> add a default (or static) i get the said
ot;test()" and "test2()") it has those
errros:
Could not find domain method similar to java.lang.String test()
Could not find domain method similar to java.lang.String test2()
Only getters and setters allowed
Only getters and setters allowed
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2016 08:46:01
I just tested your example. THIS compiles and works but when trying to add
a default (or static) i get the said errors. maybe the requestfactory apt
processor is not correctly updated to the new features?
I have checked that I have all gwt-* dependencies (including
requestfactory-apt and reques
I thought I have read somewhere that you added support for default methods
in request factory proxy interfaces. Am I wrong with this or is there just
something broken?
I just tried to add a default method to one of my proxies using gwt
2.8.0-rc1 and it tells me that only getter and setter are a
Hello there,
i wonder if there are plans to allow developers to use lambdas/method
references for requestfactory.
my idea was that there could be some overloaded versions of
fire(Receiver) and to(Receiver) that accept 1-3 lamdbas (4 if the
deprecated onViolation should be supported here too).
Hello Jens,
Thank you for your fast reply.
Am Donnerstag, 19. März 2015 10:14:58 UTC+1 schrieb Jens:
>
>
> sorry for being off-topic but where can i find current 2.8.0 snapshot jars?
>>
>> i found this repository
>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google-snapshots/com/google/gwt/g
Hey Guys,
sorry for being off-topic but where can i find current 2.8.0 snapshot jars?
i found this
repository
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google-snapshots/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/2.8.0-SNAPSHOT/
but it does not contain any jars.
thanks! :)
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2015 00:
Thank you!
That works. It seems I missed the "Function.Static.newInstance" in my last
test. :S
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014 08:28:21 UTC+1 schrieb Kay-Uwe Janssen:
>
> As i had no luck on Google+ yet, i'll try it here.
>
> First the G+ Post:
> https://plus.go
@Cristian Rinaldi unfortunately this does not work how i need it. it still
assignes the object and not the javascript function.
i think i have to wait for 2.8 to get it working. but thanks anyway :-)
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014 08:28:21 UTC+1 schrieb Kay-Uwe Janssen:
>
> As i had no l
gt; utility function that wraps a SAM as a function, e.g.
>
> public static native JavaScriptObject samToFunction(MyCallback cb) /*-{
> return function(arg) { return cb.@MyCallback::someMethod(*)(arg); };
> }-*/;
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Kay-Uwe Janssen > wrote:
As i had no luck on Google+ yet, i'll try it here.
First the G+ Post:
https://plus.google.com/116136390679208063122/posts/52kcbwwngWo
Well I just started to work on a ChromeCast Receiver built with GWT. As the
Receiver API is in JS i wanted to try JSInterop over JSNI but had some
struggle.
T
Not sure if it is already fixed, but 2.6.0 had a regression related to
@UiHandler for generic events.
see https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6091#c11
Would love to see that fixed in 2.6.1 that i can clean my code again and
merge my set of UiHanlder back into one.
T
15 matches
Mail list logo