Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: New home for GWT Eclipse Plugin

2023-03-02 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
t;>> least for the time being, Vertspan will be hosting these together. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an &

Re: [gwt-contrib] Asking for decision on DevMode embedded Jetty support

2021-04-16 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
t has nothing to do with the codeserver. dev_mode_on.js overrides/rewrites from where we are loading the nocache.js script. Sorry for the trouble and thanks for the explanations. Vassilis On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:07 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:12 P

Re: [gwt-contrib] Asking for decision on DevMode embedded Jetty support

2021-04-16 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
That's great news to hear. Is there any doc about this? How does it know when to switch between codeserver and production code? On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, 15:46 Paul Robinson wrote: > Vassilis - I don't use the bookmarklet. It may still work (I don't know) > but it's not needed in recent GWT version

Re: [gwt-contrib] Asking for decision on DevMode embedded Jetty support

2021-04-16 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
top receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CACiKNc7nSFd9PUzHQwtgai7EZriU3EOimzBtRgRro1TQ4jfObg%40mail.gmail.com > <https:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Asking for decision on DevMode embedded Jetty support

2021-04-15 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
Paul, What about the bookmarklet?. Is out working in your setup? On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, 09:56 Paul Robinson wrote: > I used the built in Jetty server until a year or so ago. Occasionally I > have to use the older version in development as we haven't upgraded > everybody in production to the new

Re: [gwt-contrib] First org.gwtproject.* modules published to Central

2020-05-25 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
t > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/b95a95fa-460d-482c-9374-b7b405309024%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/b95a95fa-460d-482c-9374-b7b405309024%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>

Re: [gwt-contrib] First org.gwtproject.* modules published to Central

2020-05-25 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
n the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9d202c46-e1ba-49ef-8144-881a9c50555b%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9d202c46-e1ba-49ef-8144-881a9c50555b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_sour

Re: [gwt-contrib] jsinterop-base github repository and new beta release

2017-11-11 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://g

Re: [gwt-contrib] NodeList and JsArrayList.asArray

2017-08-02 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
ons, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to goog

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop: @JsFunction .length always 0

2017-06-28 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
gt; in the foreseeable future as it would require a new Java AST node and thus > changes throughout the code base. > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Vassilis Virvilis > wrote: > >> Do you want me to report it as issue? If so where? >> >> Is it possible for @JsFu

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop: @JsFunction .length always 0

2017-06-28 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
aries. So... better the devil you know Vassilis On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 2:21:16 PM UTC+2, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: >> >> I am not following the implementation details and I cannot judge on the >>

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop: @JsFunction .length always 0

2017-06-28 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
t;> can be done in JS is available from Java with interop. For these situations >> you probably want to have some JS stubs. >> >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Vassilis Virvilis >> wrote: >> >>> Ok guys this is the last one - I promise. >>> >>

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop: @JsFunction .length always 0

2017-06-27 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
7; via GWT Contributors wrote: > You can call it a missing feature. Clearly not a bug, not everything that > can be done in JS is available from Java with interop. For these situations > you probably want to have some JS stubs. > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Vassilis Virvil

[gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop: @JsFunction .length always 0

2017-06-27 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
Ok guys this is the last one - I promise. Originally posted in gwt-users. Does this count as a bug or at least as a missing feature? Thanks -- Forwarded message -- From: Vassilis Virvilis Date: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:08 PM Subject: jsinterop: @JsFunction .length always 0 To

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 2: return Double[]

2017-06-27 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
olkit-contributors/CAC7T7gkupiRhKbO9CAmnKO9LUSh26 > veVjnQ0LqAGemeJvFWm9A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAC7T7gkupiRhKbO9CAmnKO9LUSh26veVjnQ0LqAGemeJvFWm9A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 2: return Double[]

2017-06-26 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
Hi and thanks for answering. I also tend to believe this is not a bug - but - it is definitely in my wish list. @Colin jsinterop is certainly kind of fragile but if you bang your head against it at the end you start understanding the errors. In most cases you can fix the error by making the java

[gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 2: return Double[]

2017-06-26 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
Originally posted in gwt-users. The question here is the same with the previous one. Is this considered a bug? Should I report it as an issue? and if so where? Thanks. -- Forwarded message -- From: Vassilis Virvilis Date: Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:44 PM Subject: jsinterop woes

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 1: instanceof function in generics casting

2017-06-25 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
I was not remembering correctly and my last comment was off. I am not using a create() method. So the editorial correction is s/and have a create() method instead of ordinal() that generates the object//g On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: > Hm... > > For m

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 1: instanceof function in generics casting

2017-06-25 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
post another stumbling block I encountered in my jsinterop journey. On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+2, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: >> >> Ηι, >> >> thanks for answering >> >>

Re: [gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 1: instanceof function in generics casting

2017-06-25 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
dinal", which > d3.ordinal is not. > > You can model it as a native interface for example where there is not such > expectation. > > So as I understand your report this is not a bug but just an error in > modellin > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Vassilis Virvilis

[gwt-contrib] Fwd: jsinterop woes: Part 1: instanceof function in generics casting

2017-06-24 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
- evaluated: function anonymous() The reason it fails is that > function com_google_gwt_lang_Cast_jsinstanceOf__Ljava_lang_Object_2Lc > om_google_gwt_core_client_JavaScriptObject_2Z(obj, jsType){ > com_google_gwt_lang_Cast_$clinit__V(); > return obj && (jsType &&a