Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

(just in case someone read this thread) This problem has already been fixed in 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT. Thanks. On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 9:17:47 PM UTC+1, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres wrote: > > At last! >

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

Tests: - Create a variable with the lambda to fix type inference; did not work. - Add a EntryPointDataOverlay.create() factory (not called); did not work. - Add EntryPointData data = new EntryPointDataPojo() before lambda; did not work, but now data_0 is not null, but its

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

At last! https://github.com/ibaca/gwt-instantiable-inference-bug/blob/master/src/main/java/com/bacamt/ibaca/client/Bug.java As Roberto said, the problem seems to be the instantiability inference. The project works correctly on draftCompile, but on optimized compile the lambas parameters gets

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

Bootstrap using lambda (fail) // java return service.get().getBootstrap().bootstrap().doOnNext(data -> { Account account = data.getAccount(); if (account == null) auth.get().resetSessionData(false); else auth.get().setSessionData(account, data.getKeychain());

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

I said that optimize=0 fix errors, but I just compiled the project a get the same bootstrap+lamba error. But with draftCompile the result looks ok. // bootstrap case, lambda, pretty, draftCompile _.lambda$5 = function lambda$5(data_0){ $clinit_ApplicationBootstrapper(); var account, user;

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

It looks to me like it might be a type inferencing issue Roberto. Remember, the lambda is matched to a SAM interface method. When it synthesizes the implementation, it takes info from JDT about the 'expected type' which is inferred by JDT. I wonder if the type inferred messes up type tightener

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

> > I did not use pretty style because I thought that this flag produces > different result, I tested now and looks like the output is the same, but, > I'm pretty sure that some flags changes this issues, optimize is obvious > that fixes the problem, but I think that namespace=package also changes

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

It would be really helpful if you could isolate your problem to a small example. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Roberto Lublinerman wrote: > I did not use pretty style because I thought that this flag produces >> different result, I tested now and looks like the output is

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

Recompiled using HEAD dcea13b1d223513418c90c34324ac6929059de3c, with no JsInterop and optimization 1. function $Xj(a, b) { var c, d, e, f; JDl(b, 'response required'); JDl(null .V0(), 'response.uuid required'); a.g = null .V0(); c = false; for (f = null .V0().V0(); f.Md();

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

function ILe(a) { var b; b = Erb(PDl(a.a, 'REFXXX store'), 164); Erb(PDl(Erb(b.De(), 82), 'REFXXX store.get()'), 82); return Erb(PDl(undefined, 'REFXXX store.get().values()'), 6) } This was the actual b.De() function. u9c(701, 1, { 164: 1, 701: 1, 3: 1 }, Uh); _.De = function Vh() {

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

This was from 94e45975a06ece1b8d65541aaabf833f9d8c7b07 (6 October 2015 at 04:29:19 GMT+2), I'll try tomorrow with HEAD, but looking the commits looks improbable that the problem has been solved. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:30 PM 'Roberto Lublinerman' via GWT Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

Are you using a recent snapshot? On Oct 24, 2015 04:40, "Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres" wrote: > There is a bug which optimizations nullify variables which might not be > null. I'm trying to reproduce the error outside our app but I can't, I'll > continue trying, but for now I

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

Are you using @JsFunction/JsInterop? Unless the implementation has changed recently, Lambda's are supported in GWT by essentially synthesizing static inner classes, and so if static inner classes work, but lambda's don't, it's really weird. The optimization stages no nothing of lambdas and only

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

The only thing I can think of is that when the class is created for the lambda in gwtastbuilder, the super class or implemented interfaces are not set up correctly. I'll check later to see if that is there case. On Oct 24, 2015 19:07, "'Ray Cromwell' via GWT Contributors" <

[gwt-contrib] GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

There is a bug which optimizations nullify variables which might not be null. I'm trying to reproduce the error outside our app but I can't, I'll continue trying, but for now I going to describe the problem. return service.get().getBootstrap().bootstrap().doOnNext(data -> { Account account