Reviewers: Dan Rice,
Message:
Review requested.
Description:
GWT RPC doesn't conside GenericTypeVoid to be serializable because it
doesn't think that Void is serializable.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/294801/show
Affected files:
A
Could you please explain this? I would assert that GenericTypeVoid should
be serializable if and only if it contains no fields of type T, where T is
substituted for void. Do you disagree with this assertion, or is there a
shortcoming in the current implementation that makes the assertion fail to
I don't follow your assertion, scott. I'm pretty sure that null is the
only legal value for a Void field, so what's the big deal about
serializing it?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Could you please explain this? I would assert that GenericTypeVoid should
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
I don't follow your assertion, scott. I'm pretty sure that null is the
only legal value for a Void field, so what's the big deal about
serializing it?
null is the only value. This supports a command-style use case where
you
Oh, I get your point now. Sorry.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
I don't follow your assertion, scott. I'm pretty sure that null is the
only legal value for a Void field, so what's the big deal about
serializing it?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Scott
