Yeah, that's why I qualified it with partially. I guess the logical answer
if he's getting different behavior would be that he is in fact not compiling
the same code or is using a different version of the SDK.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:16 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Chris Conroy wrote:
> well, that would at least partially explain this:
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/5d026150c1d31b6f?hl=en#
That might explain why the compiled code was different, but wouldn't explain
why he was getti
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:25 PM, wrote:
> Change LGTM, but why is this a problem in practice? Isn't the generated
> source transient?
It is, except when you use the -gen flag because you actually want to see
the generated output. What I was seeing is that, in some cases, the line
endings would
well, that would at least partially explain this:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/5d026150c1d31b6f?hl=en#
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:48 PM, wrote:
> LGTM if you scatter some notes explaining why.
>
>
> On 2010/08/20 18:25:49, bobv wrote:
>
>> Change LGTM, bu
LGTM if you scatter some notes explaining why.
On 2010/08/20 18:25:49, bobv wrote:
Change LGTM, but why is this a problem in practice? Isn't the
generated source
transient?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/776803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Change LGTM, but why is this a problem in practice? Isn't the generated
source transient?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/776803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
