These warnings has popped up for many compiled GWT applications for
me.
The threat is that hidden malicious code can exist inside the
JavaScript. So, GWT
is under heavy threats node due to their js compilation.
There's a quite random state whether the virus signature is found or
not, so i hope
that
I got a report of a user seeing the same signature on our website.
I've got a second submission in the queue to cover that one as well.
They've got a testing license that I should be able to download and
use to reduce when I have a second.
On 2009-12-09, at 11:29 AM, Joel Webber wrote:
> We
I just submitted the samples a short while ago. The status is
currently "Our Virus Research Team still works on your submission".
The automated system gave me these URLs to follow the progress of the
submission. I hope something useful will show up here when they are
processed:
http://anal
Were you able to get any information on the signature (assuming it's
signature-based) from Avira? Their page on the subject is, uh, less than
useful.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> We've just had reports of people seeing this while installing our
> chrome extension. I'm
We've just had reports of people seeing this while installing our
chrome extension. I'm not near a Windows VM right now, but I can see
if it's easy to reproduce when I get back:
http://getsatisfaction.com/dotspots/topics/dotspots_plugin_for_chrome_installer_problems
There's a lot of embedded
If you can find out what was triggering this from Avira, I'd really like to
see it. This is probably the third-ish time we've seen a report like this,
and it would be really helpful to understand what kind of virus snippets
they're looking for. If there's something we can do in our code gen to avoi
On Nov 30, 3:43 pm, BobV wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> > Does one app make heavier use of CssResource than the other? A bell is
> > ringing about mhtml security concerns. Or did we back out our mhtml use?
>
> I disabled MHTML support in r6839 (trunk) and r6840 (2.0
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> Does one app make heavier use of CssResource than the other? A bell is
> ringing about mhtml security concerns. Or did we back out our mhtml use?
I disabled MHTML support in r6839 (trunk) and r6840 (2.0) because it
has too many browser/OS gotcha
Does one app make heavier use of CssResource than the other? A bell is
ringing about mhtml security concerns. Or did we back out our mhtml use?
On Nov 28, 2009 7:22 AM, "Thomas Broyer" wrote:
On 28 nov, 12:29, dflorey wrote: > Thanks for your
suggestion! I've uplo...
My boss is using Avira on h
On 28 nov, 12:29, dflorey wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion! I've uploaded a generated file and will
> post the response to this thread.
> I was wondering if all gwt-generated files will be classified as
> malware by Avira or if it depends on some generated javascript
> snippets.
My boss is u
Thanks for your suggestion! I've uploaded a generated file and will
post the response to this thread.
I was wondering if all gwt-generated files will be classified as
malware by Avira or if it depends on some generated javascript
snippets.
On Nov 24, 4:58 pm, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> The best appr
The best approach is probably to upload the file in question to
Avira's false-positive reporting page:
http://analysis.avira.com/samples/index.php
On 24-Nov-09, at 8:19 AM, dflorey wrote:
> Am I the only one with this issue?
>
> On 19 Nov., 17:29, dflorey wrote:
>> Hi,
>> since a few weeksAvi
Am I the only one with this issue?
On 19 Nov., 17:29, dflorey wrote:
> Hi,
> since a few weeksAviraAntiVir is generating warnings when accessing
> gwt-generated files:
>
> When accessing data from the URL, "http://
> allcontacts.southpolecarbon.com/sharedcontacts/
> C7C22E75261E4D2C9C7FAF82B71C40
13 matches
Mail list logo
