[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on OverlayTypes in google-web-toolkit

2010-11-27 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by ltearno: This is too bad (at the end of the document) : The implementation of overlay types in GWT 1.5 does not support Generators defining new JSO subtypes (due to the need to redefine or otherwise extend JavaScriptObject$ during subsequent compilation). This restriction is

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on OverlayTypes in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-15 Thread Joel Webber
I'm assuming we'd have to rewrite new and field access operators to these classes in the hosted-mode classloader, right? I haven't messed with the hosted-mode classloader in a *very* long time, so we may be doing this already for all I know. If that's feasible, this sounds like it would be pretty

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on OverlayTypes in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-15 Thread BobV
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Joel Webberj...@google.com wrote: I'm assuming we'd have to rewrite new and field access operators to these classes in the hosted-mode classloader, right? I haven't messed with the hosted-mode classloader in a *very* long time, so we may be doing this already

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on OverlayTypes in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-15 Thread Bruce Johnson
+1 to field overlays. Just need to schedule the work. On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:23 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Joel Webberj...@google.com wrote: I'm assuming we'd have to rewrite new and field access operators to these classes in the hosted-mode