[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2010-04-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by plindsay: So when will Windows 7 64 bit + eclipse 64 bit be supported on Windows 7? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2010-03-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by ap.forrest: When we log into our product we launch a new browser window, also we unfortunately use iFrames as a result of legacy code. Both scenarios make it awkward to set the 'gwt.hosted' property on the appropriate URLs. Has anyone else had a similar issue or aware of a workar

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2010-01-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by dusan.maliarik: @tamplinjohn I believie there is version with loadable extension available quite some time. Is it that difficult to make x-platform dialogs? Wouldn't JS's Window.confirm() do the trick? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingO

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-12-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by ziman200: i use ff 3.7 and plugin not work with this version For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-12-07 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by brian.ireilly: I'm also experiencing slowness on Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.8). I'm still on Safari 4.0.3 because of the problems I'd heard that people were having with 4.0.4, however I see the same slowness in Firefox 3.5.5. Where I really notice it is with a GWT-RPC loop that I have

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-12-04 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by key...@gmail.com: I am slow experiencing very long load times whenever I hit run or refresh on hosted mode. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-12-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by jeffvictor: Is anyone else experiencing *extremely* slow DevMode on a mac? I'm using Leopard 10.5.8 with all of the updates and running DevMode with 64 bit Java 6. I experience the same slowness when using 32 bit Java 5 as well. I'm using 2.0 RC 2 and experience the problem usi

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by arunabha.gh: @thomas.matthijs That did the trick, thanks For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by thomas.matthijs: That means you didn't pass the ?gwt.hosted=localhost:9997 in the url For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-29 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by arunabha.gh: @mark.renouf Atfer the patch and build when the app is started in firefox I get a 'GWT module 'xxx' needs to be (re)compiled, please run a compile or use the Compile/Browse button in hosted mode'. This happens even after compiling the project. Any ideas? For more inf

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-17 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by dusan.maliarik: @mark.renouf: Thanks Mark! You saved my day :) BTW have you seen nice new templates for SOYC? now we have yet another place for Google logo to creep on us For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.co

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by mark.renouf: This patch will make GAE/Eclipse happy for now, seems to work with no side effects. Patch and build with 'ant dist-dev'. {{{ Index: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java === --- dev/core/src/com/g

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by mark.renouf: This patch will make GAE/Eclipse happy for now, seems to work with no side effects. Patch and build with 'ant dist-dev'. Index: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java === --- dev/core/src/com/googl

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-12 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by rda...@google.com: @mauzepeda: Thanks for providing the summary of how to make things work with the current state of trunk and the plugin. I don't think it is necessary that gwt-dev.jar be renamed to gwt-dev-linux.jar though. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-w

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by mauzepeda: You may have to rename gwt-dev.jar to gwt-dev-linux.jar For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by mauzepeda: Tips to make it work (Ubuntu 9.04 64bits, Eclipse Plugin, -noserver): - Latest release didn't work, I found another one I had on my computer. - Make sure you have ant installed and that it works. - Make sure you have Java 6 32 Bits - You'll have to go to the root directory of

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-11 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by martin.g...@gmail.com: thanks for the hint - works like a charm now. all my previous problems are solved. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-W

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by step...@aisper.com: @Martin, @josetex: the workaround is to create a plain Java launch config (as suggested above) calling com.google.gwt.dev.DevMode - the only gotcha here is to make sure you set -Xmx256M as a VM argument. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-w

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by tamplinjohn: Things are under rapid change as we try and get 2.0 out the door, so you can either go back to released versions of the Eclipse plugin and GWT, or you can wait for the RC when there will be an update to the Eclipse plugin that will work with it. For more informatio

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by josetex: Same problem here. After building GWT from trunk I am getting "Unknown argument: -style" when launching my app. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-10 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by martin.g...@gmail.com: i got it working with latest trunk. no idea what was changed... but now i'm facing another problem: "Unknown argument: -style" when trying to launch (via eclipse plugin generated launch file) the application. any workaround available? or do i need a new vers

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-11-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by gwtdevel...@gmail.com: @tamplinjohn: I managed to OOPHM to work in XUL by creating a new Linker See http://www.gdevelop.com/w/2009/10/30/using-oophm-to-develop-xul-applications/ For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM --~--~-~--~-

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-06 Thread brett.wooldridge
I am able to use Mac/OOPHM/Firefox3.5. Did you follow the directions (and discussions) on this page? http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors On the other hand, I didn't use the provided link (Firefox) ... I built the plugin. Brett On Sep 6, 11:07 am, c

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-26 Thread Joel Webber
Could you give some detail as to what circumstances you're seeing this happen? It's at possible that I did something to the selection script or hosted.html that caused this to happen more frequently, but I'm not having any problems on my end. The fact that hard-coding the module (as opposed to read

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-06-25 Thread Todd Seiber
I am having the same problem. Until a fix is found you can hack the hosted.html that gets injected in to your module's output directory. var moduleFuncName = window.location.search.substring(1); if (!moduleFuncName || !$wnd[moduleFuncName]) { moduleFuncName = window.name; } moduleFuncName="your

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-05-24 Thread Vitali Lovich
Worked for me. Did you use the XPI or XPCOM one? On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, wrote: > > Comment by henr...@yahoo.fr: > > The provided firefox plugin doesn't work for me (Linux x86_64). > > I had to build a new firefox plugin from SVN. > > > For more information: > http://code.google.com/p/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-04-23 Thread Vitali Lovich
There's a link on the website to download the xpi off the web. It does not come with GWT trunk (it's in a branch). The gwt-dev-oophm.jar is built when you build trunk. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:15 PM, John Tamplin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Freeland Abbott wrote: > >> On that

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-04-23 Thread John Tamplin
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Freeland Abbott wrote: > On that topic, I've been quietly lobbying to move the svn/tools directory > into svn/trunk/..., although there's already a "tools" directory (which adds > to the confusion; it's different), so it would have to be named something > else. >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-04-23 Thread Freeland Abbott
On that topic, I've been quietly lobbying to move the svn/tools directory into svn/trunk/..., although there's already a "tools" directory (which adds to the confusion; it's different), so it would have to be named something else. I think it'd be a lot simpler for this sort of confusion... but the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-04-23 Thread Jason Essington
the tools directory is a separate checkout. read this: http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#workingoncode -jason On Apr 23, 2009, at 3:51 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote: > > Comment by tutufan: > > So far I'm not having much luck (64-bit Ubuntu 9.04). The file > gwt-d