[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes pathological slowness in remote UI logger (GPE) (issue550801)

2010-06-11 Thread scottb
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/550801/diff/1/2 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/remoteui/MessageTransport.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/550801/diff/1/2#newcode240 dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/remoteui/MessageTransport.java:240: class FutureTaskExtensio

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes pathological slowness in remote UI logger (GPE) (issue550801)

2010-06-11 Thread rdayal
LGTM, just address the comments below before committing. I'll also take care of the GPE MessageTransport update. (if you can create a bug and assign it to me about the error logging and updating MessageTransport in GPE, that would be great:) http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/550801/diff/1/2 F

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes pathological slowness in remote UI logger (GPE) (issue550801)

2010-06-11 Thread scottb
Side note: When these changes to MessageTransport land, we should update GPE so that it uses this newer version of MessageTransport as well; it's not a requirement, but it's nice to keep them somewhat in sync. Ah, sure thing. You will handle that? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/5508

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes pathological slowness in remote UI logger (GPE) (issue550801)

2010-06-10 Thread rdayal
I like the cleanup you've done here - however, there are a few things that I'd like you to take a look at before I give the LGTM. Let's go for one more round on this one; we can discuss this stuff f2f if it's easier. Side note: When these changes to MessageTransport land, we should update GPE so

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes pathological slowness in remote UI logger (GPE) (issue550801)

2010-06-01 Thread scottb
PING rdayal. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/550801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes pathological slowness in remote UI logger (GPE) (issue550801)

2010-05-21 Thread jat
This is definitely something that Rajeev should look at since I didn't have much to do with this part of it. On a relatively superficial look everything looks ok, but it seems like there should be tests that explicitly cover all the cases of trying to log branches/messages to a logger before the