http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java (left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java#oldc
Please add acleung as a reviewer
On 2011/08/05 21:19:37, stephenh wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java#new
Did you try this against trunk or GWT 2.3/2.4? I made some changes
recently to the way liveness of class literals are calculated that may
or may not have an effect relative to this.
If you mean the "Roll seed-function optimization forward again" commit
[1] (or others before it), yeah, I was ho
On 2011/08/15 13:53:06, zundel wrote:
Please add acleung as a reviewer
Done.
(The edit issue form didn't recognize just "acleung", so I added
"acleung@google".com. Hope that's okay.)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributor
The thing is, if B is a subtype of A, and B is rescued, then A is also
rescued.
Yeah, the rub is that B did not get rescued into FragmentB, it just
ended up there because it was in the set of FragmentA+FragmentB, but not
FragmentA or FragmentB individually, in which case it ends up in
whicheve
Ping.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Ping. Can we get this review wrapped up? I'd like to push this into GWT
2.5 (or close the issue completely, if not).
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2012/04/05 19:48:18, zundel wrote:
Ping Ping.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:58 AM, wrote:
> If you mean the "Roll seed-function optimization forward again" commit
> [1] (or others before it), yeah, I was hoping that would fix it, but it
> did not.
It surprises me that CFA doesn't take care of this and that it needs
to be done as a fix up. One
11 matches
Mail list logo