Shouldn't com.google.gwt.resources.ext.DefaultExtensions have been
included in this patch?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802/diff/1011/17
File user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/ext/DefaultExtensions.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802/diff/1011/17#newcode28
Line 28: * {...@link
com.google.gwt.resources.client.ClientBundle.SourceSource} annotation
The @link
This is a nice cleanup, but I have questions about your annotation
search
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802/diff/1011/18
File user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/ext/ResourceGeneratorUtil.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802/diff/1011/18#newcode135
Line 135: public stat
LGTM w/a couple of javadoc tweaks.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802/diff/28/1039
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JClassType.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/61802/diff/28/1039#newcode368
Line 368: * which this type is assignable. Annotations present
> Is there an appropriate more general home for this? I know I do it all
the time.
> Could it be an instance method on JClassType?
Moved to JClassType.findAnnotationInTypeHierarchy()
> For annotations marked @Inherited, would the super-crawl even be
necessary?
@Inherited doesn't work for superi
