Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

2015-10-24 Thread 'Ray Cromwell' via GWT Contributors
Does it still happen if you use an anonymous inner class instead of a lambda? On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres < igna...@bacamt.com> wrote: > Other situation producing the same problem. If next code is replaced by > lambda and method reference... the next block end up

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

2015-10-24 Thread Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres
Anonymous classes works correctly in both cases. El sáb., 24 de octubre de 2015 19:52, 'Ray Cromwell' via GWT Contributors < google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com> escribió: > Does it still happen if you use an anonymous inner class instead of a > lambda? > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT compiler optimization breaks some lambdas

2015-10-24 Thread Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres
Other situation producing the same problem. If next code is replaced by lambda and method reference... the next block end up being optimized as if response is always null. //noinspection Convert2Lambda,Anonymous2MethodRef IGP-1732 gwt optimize incompatible tracker.add(heads.subscribe(new