On 24-Jul-09, at 9:11 PM, BobV wrote:
>> Also, will this be supported on methods themselves? For instance,
>> can
>> I mark a new method parameter as @Optional so that older clients
>> don't
>> need to provide it? Conversely, could we remove a parameter from a
>> method and still support cl
> Also, will this be supported on methods themselves? For instance, can
> I mark a new method parameter as @Optional so that older clients don't
> need to provide it? Conversely, could we remove a parameter from a
> method and still support clients sending data with the old signature?
I could g
On 24-Jul-09, at 6:39 PM, BobV wrote:
> I have a design wave going on about how to add this to the new RPC
> implementation. Here's a cruddy copy-and-paste of the current state
> of the document.
Bob, this is awesome!
Is the plan to land this as part of deRPC, or is this a future feature
tha
> Is the concept of versioning something that belongs in the core GWT
> RPC code, or is this something better suited for an external library?
I have a design wave going on about how to add this to the new RPC
implementation. Here's a cruddy copy-and-paste of the current state
of the document.
