[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-15 Thread BobV
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! LGTU. Committed at r3760. I'm going to follow up to this with a patch to pass in the caller of makeChild() and makeSynthetic() since findCaller() was removed. -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team --~--~-~-

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-15 Thread Lex Spoon
Cool! LGTU. -Lex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-15 Thread Lex Spoon
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Katharina Probst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I would say yes to the equals and compareTo, but I wouldn't consider the > hashCode a blocking issue (although it's the simplest fix...). > > The equals and compareTo have the potential to create information loss (for >

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-14 Thread BobV
Would it be correct to summarize the chief blocking issue as needing to reconsider the equals / compareTo / hashCode functions on SourceInfo and Correlation? -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Too

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-14 Thread Lex Spoon
Kathrin and I reviewed this together. In general, this solves an important use case, so let's move forward on it aside from minor issues. The following use cases are the ones we could think of: - Seeing what amount of output code (and in fact the actual code if you want) corresponds to what i

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-03 Thread BobV
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Is there any reason to store all correlates as strings? The I agree that the final API provided by the Correlation type should be more structured than just a String, but I don't think that it should hang on to the AST no

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-02 Thread Scott Blum
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. Attaching a method to its overrider parent seems to mix two > separate meanings of ancestor. In most of SOYC, the ancestors of a > node are previous versions of the same node, only before some > transformation had occurred.

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: SOYC Correlation work

2008-10-02 Thread Lex Spoon
The implementation looks good, and the new feature is very good. I have two design questions, though: 1. Is there any reason to store all correlates as strings? The problem with strings is that any code that wants to process the correlates, as opposed to simply printing them out, will need to p