Thank you! Committed as revision 4344.
kathrin
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Katharina Probst wrote:
>> Hi Lex,
>>
>> I've made all the changes you requested except the first, which we
>> have decided not to do for now (reason: SourceIn
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Katharina Probst wrote:
> Hi Lex,
>
> I've made all the changes you requested except the first, which we
> have decided not to do for now (reason: SourceInfo does not contain a
> pointer to the node, so instead we would have to keep JMethod around
> until link tim
Hi Lex,
I've made all the changes you requested except the first, which we
have decided not to do for now (reason: SourceInfo does not contain a
pointer to the node, so instead we would have to keep JMethod around
until link time, which seemed overkill).
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks
Hi, this patch records some information that makes the final report
much easier to read. The internal fragment numbers are really
obscure, so the less they show up in the reports, the better.
It looks generally good but I think there should be a few small modifications.
First, it looks like it
