Hey Stephen,
Thanks for the info. So we should probably try and land it. From my quick
summary of the comment thread, it looks like there's disagreement on the
implementation. Can you or John save me some time and fill me in on the
history?
Rajeev
On Fri May 04 14:24:11 GMT-400 2012, wrote:
HA!
If it's important enough, we should land it, but my impression is that it
isn't - so maybe it should die a quiet death.
On Fri May 04 14:13:42 GMT-400 2012, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:15 PM, wrote:
>
> Was debating whether this one should go in for GWT 2.5, but my
>
