[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove DOCTYPEs from all our modules. (issue1772803)

2012-09-08 Thread t . broyer
ping! (would be great to have it in 2.5) https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1772803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove DOCTYPEs from all our modules. (issue1772803)

2012-07-10 Thread jat
Why not just fix the URL (removing the tags and pointing at head) instead? I am not positive, but I believe there are internal tools that expect the DTD to be present. https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1772803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove DOCTYPEs from all our modules. (issue1772803)

2012-07-09 Thread skybrian
On 2012/07/09 15:30:02, tbroyer wrote: A small one for your last day guys. Seems fine to me. But I wonder if we're just hiding some underlying issue with the XML parser we're using. There's no particular reason why development mode should be downloading DTD's, even if users put them in their

[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove DOCTYPEs from all our modules. (issue1772803)

2012-07-09 Thread t . broyer
On 2012/07/09 15:37:43, skybrian wrote: On 2012/07/09 15:30:02, tbroyer wrote: A small one for your last day guys. Seems fine to me. But I wonder if we're just hiding some underlying issue with the XML parser we're using. There's no particular reason why development mode should be

[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove DOCTYPEs from all our modules. (issue1772803)

2012-07-09 Thread t . broyer
On 2012/07/09 15:39:57, tbroyer wrote: On 2012/07/09 15:37:43, skybrian wrote: On 2012/07/09 15:30:02, tbroyer wrote: A small one for your last day guys. Seems fine to me. But I wonder if we're just hiding some underlying issue with the XML parser we're using. There's no particular