Assuming we like the concept, I have two issues noted here.
At the larger level, people should be doing this today in e.g. build.xml
as a wrapper, which also works... I'm not sure whether I'd be more
annoyed to fail on existing dirt, or to have something I'd tried to
preserve be overwritten.
I'm also not sure this is a bug. If it's set read-only, why would we try to
clobber it?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, fabb...@google.com wrote:
Assuming we like the concept, I have two issues noted here.
At the larger level, people should be doing this today in e.g. build.xml
as a
