Submitted r4234
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seeing as we don't actually throw any of those yet, I'd like to stay
> ambiguous on that front.
> rjrjr
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Should we say that Ille
Seeing as we don't actually throw any of those yet, I'd like to stay
ambiguous on that front.
rjrjr
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we say that IllegalArgumentExceptions should be preferred for
> invalid input?
> Other then that, LGTM.
>
>
> On
Should we say that IllegalArgumentExceptions should be preferred for invalid
input?
Other then that, LGTM.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Ray Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per our earlier conversation, softening the requirements on HasValue.
> Intended for submission to releases/1.6
> rjrjr
