On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:18 AM, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray,
>
> There is already an issue reported do I add a comment or you want me to
> create a new issue ?
> This is the current reported issue:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1902
>
> Will it break so
Ray,
There is already an issue reported do I add a comment or you want me to
create a new issue ?
This is the current reported issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1902
Will it break so much code when deferring attachment ?
I can only speak for my own projects and
>
> A flag on the TabPanel/DeckPanel would be a better solution, I would just
> subclass and make sure that the lazy attachment is used on all our panels.
> That I could get away with, but still I find it a pitty that it is not the
> default behaviour.
> D
>
Yes, for new widgets that is exactly wh
The constructor flag is a great idea. David, would you mind logging an issue
to that effect?
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:58 AM, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I didn't see any comments... oh, sarcasm =)
>>
>
> I'm not going to repeat myself... but there is room for improvement on how
> bugs
>
>
> I didn't see any comments... oh, sarcasm =)
>
I'm not going to repeat myself... but there is room for improvement on how
bugs and feature requests are treated!
> Since the TabPanel (really the DeckPanel) currently attaches widgets to the
> DOM immediately, we might have backward compatibi
>
> Thanks for the great comments!
>
I didn't see any comments... oh, sarcasm =)
Since the TabPanel (really the DeckPanel) currently attaches widgets to the
DOM immediately, we might have backward compatibility issues if we attach
them lazily. We could make lazy attachment an optional setting th
Thanks for the great comments!
It turns out that this bug is already reported (and 5 stars as well)
in the issue database.
jlaba is the owner of the bug and priority is medium
Here is the bug report:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1902
David
On Nov 27, 8:51 am
People,
I recently read about lazy loading panels
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2008/11/profiling-gwt-application-performance.html
I am actually asking for offering lazy attaching tabpanels as a
default implementation. In most cases you only get a
performance problem when you attach t
