It's not about the lack of a plugin mechanism, it's about discomfort with an
api that requires people to emit lines of java too much, and lack of time to
clean it up.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 9, 1:45 pm, "Konstantin.Scheglov"
> wrote:
> > > If anyone wan
On Sep 9, 1:45 pm, "Konstantin.Scheglov"
wrote:
> > If anyone wants to submit a patch to make it possible to subclass
> > UiBinderGenerator and tweak its parsers that way, s.t. you can provide an
> > alternative rule for your custom subclass, I'd be in favor of
> > that. Presuming Joel doesn't
> If anyone wants to submit a patch to make it possible to subclass
> UiBinderGenerator and tweak its parsers that way, s.t. you can provide an
> alternative rule for your custom subclass, I'd be in favor of
> that. Presuming Joel doesn't shoot me down.
Hm...
Replacing UiBinderGenerator mean
The 2.1 release branch will be cut from trunk. Trunk does not include a
public api to add new parsers to UiBinder.
If anyone wants to submit a patch to make it possible to subclass
UiBinderGenerator and tweak its parsers that way, s.t. you can provide an
alternative rule for your custom subclass,
2.1 GA is not going to be built from trunk?
On Sep 3, 3:38 pm, Ray Ryan wrote:
> We'd like it to, but we haven't set a date.
>
> On Sep 3, 2010 12:15 AM, "Johan Rydberg" wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9/1/10 10:01 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> >> Sorry, still not public. However, we're landing a patch that will
>
