Thanks Colin! I'm glad to see the power of the community in action :-)
- Andrés Testi
El lunes, 21 de octubre de 2013 19:59:53 UTC-3, Colin Alworth escribió:
Tentative patch up at https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/5063 - can
someone sanity check it for me? It looks like step 4 (now step 3)
If only *all* of my changes were that easy to make...
On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:15:12 AM UTC-5, Andrés Testi wrote:
Thanks Colin! I'm glad to see the power of the community in action :-)
- Andrés Testi
El lunes, 21 de octubre de 2013 19:59:53 UTC-3, Colin Alworth escribió:
Tentative
The changes may be small and easy, but consequences may be great. In this
case, your change will save lots of useless google searches to newbie
contributors ;-)
- Andrés Testi
El martes, 22 de octubre de 2013 10:32:43 UTC-3, Colin Alworth escribió:
If only *all* of my changes were that easy
Tentative patch up at https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/5063 - can
someone sanity check it for me? It looks like step 4 (now step 3) should
have previously been pointing to step 3 (now step 2), so is now more
correct.
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 2:12:17 PM UTC-5, Andrés Testi wrote:
Thanks
On Friday, October 18, 2013 5:30:25 PM UTC+2, Andrés Testi wrote:
Where is the gwt-customchecks.jar file referred in eclipse/README.txt? Is
it no longer required to configure codecheck?
Thanks in advance.
It's gone, and no longer required.
See https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1051
--
Thanks Thomas. I think it should be removed from eclipse/README.txt.
- Andrés Testi
El domingo, 20 de octubre de 2013 13:25:24 UTC-3, Thomas Broyer escribió:
On Friday, October 18, 2013 5:30:25 PM UTC+2, Andrés Testi wrote:
Where is the gwt-customchecks.jar file referred in
