On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Freeland Abbott wrote:
> I am assuming your union would be the following:
>>
>>- all foo*.java
>>- all bar*.java
>>
>> Is that correct?
>>
>
> Close, but it'd actually include all foo*.java and all b*.java, not just
> bar*.java. But you probably knew that
Further clarifying after face-to-face with John: I'm proposing, for all
modules touching a given java package, *union over modules of ( -
)*
it'd be nice to find an optimized expression that reduced the list away, but
the obvious *union() - intersection()* doesn't do
that.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:10 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
>
>
How would you handle the following:
>
> A: include foo*.java, exclude b*.java
> B: include bar*.java, exclude foobaz.java
>
> I am assuming your union would be the following:
>
>- all foo*.java
>- all bar*.java
>
> Is that correct?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Freeland Abbott wrote:
> I wanted to ask the list a question, since we've looped back to an old
> discussion at
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ResourceOracle about how
> to treat overlapping source modules.
>
> The question is what to do if a G
I wanted to ask the list a question, since we've looped back to an old
discussion at
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ResourceOracle about how to
treat overlapping source modules.
The question is what to do if a GWT App inherits two (or more) modules that
have selective source incl
