Kind thanks to KUMC and the sites that volunteered to test.
With help from Wisconsin and MCW so far, I have a lot of revisions to
add to the original script that make the output smaller, the syntax less
Oracle-specific, and eliminate or scrub certain fields. If you're not
one of the test sites,
I started trying out the script last week.
1st bit of feedback: It was taking a lot longer than the estimated 20 minutes.
Just building the 1st intermediate table took longer than that.
I have since lost my sesson/context (had to reboot my desktop... sigh...)
I guess my high order feedback is:
Please copy gpc-dev when you submit it, John.
--
Dan
From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] on
behalf of John Steinmetz [jsteinm...@kumc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 1:24 PM
To: 'Campbell, James R';
Here is the linkhttps://pcornet.centraldesktop.com/c4gpc/file/34887855/ to
the deliverable on CDT. It is one document that contains 2.1, 2.5, and 2.7.
2.3 was previously submitted, and can be found on CDT at this
linkhttps://pcornet.centraldesktop.com/c4gpc/file/32487317/.
John.
From: Dan
#158: usable view of LOINC lab terms
-+
Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: budh0007
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: data-domains2
Component: data-stds| Resolution:
Keywords:
I don't expect we'll get through all of this, so come prepared with input on
the order...
Tues 11amCT:
1. Convene, take roll, review records and plan next meeting
* ​Meeting ID and access code:
686-845-717https://global.gotomeeting.com/meeting/join/686845717; call +1
(267) 507-0008
Nice.
For bonus points, update the obesity data elements ticket
(#33https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/33) to note this
pattern in general and the obesity aspects in particular. For sensitive
material, put it in the KUMC REDCap project I recently invited you to:
* GPC
First of all, I feel like I'm treading into sensitive territory here, in
that where I point out on problems it can be misinterpreted as
criticizing other people's work. So let me just re-affirm:
We are all geeks here. It's us against the bugs. When we engage in
debate, both sides win by
What you've written is entirely responsive to my questions. As I say, I'm
largely ignorant of this whole field (emperical data validation), so I
appreciate the being educated by way of verbose specifics.
I think I have a few substantive questions in response, but I want to read over
what you
(Please excuse the awkward top-posting format; I'm stuck with Microsoft
Outlook.)
Perhaps we're converging... the new Data Builder
codehttps://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/134#comment:4
delivers an sqlite3 file, so you can continue to use SQL to analyze it; and if
you like
10 matches
Mail list logo
