So, if I am hearing you correctly Nate, we will change 'Deleted' to
''Deleted/Cancelled' and use across Cerner and Epic and change 'Secondaty' to
'Secondary/Nonprimary' for convergence since in Epic we are using Secondary to
annotate diagnoses 2-N and it does not mean 'second'
JIM
James R.
That sounds like a reasonable convergence of cancelled/deleted terms to
me. Laurel, those terms work for Marshfield as well, correct?
My only adjustment would be on your second point to simplify it to
³non-primary² since it seems that the ³secondary² term is not truly
reflective of an ordinal
Great, thanks, especially for the bit about the shortcuts. That would have
been tough to suss out on my own.
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:dconno...@kumc.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 5:43 PM
To: Lenon Patrick; 'Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu'
Subject: RE: NAACCR metadata, latest go-round
1) I
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18EVk8xyca2QUjBHJ13l5ASXOUA9Fg87Bp9e-4gVhvgU/edit?usp=sharing
All should be able to edit.
Hubert Hickman
Applications Sr. Analyst
huhick...@nebraskamed.com
(402) 559-4838
Nebraska Medicine E-mail Confidentiality Disclaimer
Now that I think about it, primary/non-primary is orthogonal to data
attribution. I'm inclined to make that a separate issue, if only to simplify
teleconference discussion.
--
Dan
___
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
I just realized this proposal doesn't facilitate the main distinction our users
are accustomed to: billing vs. clinical diagnosis. They'd have to know to
choose the union of Enounter, Order, Problem list, and Professional. In HERON
at KUMC, the union of Problem List and Encounter is represented
#71: portable HERON ETL for Epic
-+---
Reporter: dconnolly| Owner: bos
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: etl-dev | Resolution:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
#186: Querying age by numerical constraints
-+
Reporter: huhickman| Owner: jdale
Type: problem | Status: assigned
Priority: major|
An order diagnosis originates from a clinical system and eventually makes its
way into one of the two billing systems (Hospital or Professional). Typically
the physician needs to sign for an order, so you shouldn't trust a diagnosis on
an order unless it was signed.
In the revenue cycle for
From the structure of our EHR and my understanding as clinician/informatician
I cannot help but ask what is the difference between a visit and and
encounter? A visit with me
as pricare is an encounter and most face-to-face with clinicians are
encounters. What is the distinction we are seeking
From our data loading perspective, when entering information from a medication
order / dispense, for example, if there is an associated encounter number we
include it, but with the date in the particular table extracted from. So,
from the observation_fact perspective, there are going to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
